-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
hotfix: fix logout logic #72
Conversation
- LogoutPageλ₯Ό μΆκ°νμ¬ λ‘κ·Έμμ λ¬Έμ λ₯Ό ν΄κ²°νμμ΅λλ€.
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request encompass modifications across multiple components and hooks related to user authentication and data handling. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/pages/Layout.jsx (1)
12-12
: Approve changes with a suggestion for variable naming.The changes improve the component by showing a loading page while user data is being fetched, which enhances the user experience. The conditional rendering logic is concise and clear.
However, I suggest renaming the
isLoading
variable to something more explicit, such asisUserDataLoading
. This would make it immediately clear what data is being loaded.Consider applying this change:
- const isLoading = useUserData() + const isUserDataLoading = useUserData() - {isLoading ? <LoadingPage /> : <RouterProvider router={router} />} + {isUserDataLoading ? <LoadingPage /> : <RouterProvider router={router} />}This small change would improve the code's readability and make its purpose more evident.
Also applies to: 18-18
src/components/UserProfile/UserEditButton.jsx (1)
26-26
: Approve simplification of logout functionality with considerations.The simplification of the logout functionality to a direct navigation action aligns well with the PR objectives and improves the separation of concerns. This change effectively moves the logout logic to a dedicated page, which can potentially improve maintainability.
However, consider the following points:
- User feedback: The immediate navigation might not provide immediate feedback to the user about the logout process. Consider adding a loading state or feedback mechanism.
- Error handling: Ensure that the new logout page handles potential errors effectively and communicates them clearly to the user.
- Consistency: The profile edit button uses the
state
property in navigation, while the logout button doesn't. If this is intentional, it's fine; otherwise, consider harmonizing the navigation approach.To enhance user experience, you might want to implement a confirmation dialog before navigating to the logout page. This could be achieved using Ant Design's
Modal.confirm()
. For example:import { Modal } from 'antd'; // ... onClick={() => { Modal.confirm({ title: 'λ‘κ·Έμμ', content: 'μ λ§ λ‘κ·Έμμνμκ² μ΅λκΉ?', onOk: () => navigate('/logout'), okText: 'νμΈ', cancelText: 'μ·¨μ', }); }}This would provide users with a chance to confirm their action before being logged out.
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (6)
- src/components/UserProfile/UserEditButton.jsx (1 hunks)
- src/hooks/useUserData.js (1 hunks)
- src/pages/Layout.jsx (1 hunks)
- src/pages/LogoutPage/LogoutPage.jsx (1 hunks)
- src/pages/index.js (2 hunks)
- src/router.jsx (1 hunks)
π§° Additional context used
π Additional comments (13)
src/pages/index.js (3)
10-10
: LGTM: LogoutPage component added correctlyThe
LogoutPage
component has been added using the same lazy loading pattern as the other components in this file. This is consistent with the existing code structure and follows best practices for code splitting and performance optimization.
20-20
: LGTM: LogoutPage export added correctlyThe
LogoutPage
component has been correctly added to the list of exports. This makes the new component available for use in other parts of the application, which is necessary for implementing the refactored logout logic as mentioned in the PR objectives.
Line range hint
10-20
: Verify the integration of LogoutPage componentThe addition of the
LogoutPage
component aligns with the PR objective to refactor the logout logic. To ensure complete implementation:
- Confirm that the
LogoutPage
component is properly implemented in its file (./LogoutPage/LogoutPage
).- Verify that the application's routing has been updated to use this new
LogoutPage
component for the logout process.- Check if any existing logout logic in other components (e.g.,
UserEditButton
mentioned in the PR summary) has been updated or removed to use this new centralized logout page.To assist in this verification, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify if the
LogoutPage
component is properly implemented and integrated into the application.β Verification successful
LogoutPage component integration verified successfully
- The
LogoutPage
component exists atsrc/pages/LogoutPage/LogoutPage.jsx
.- Routing in
src/router.jsx
correctly uses<pages.LogoutPage />
for the'logout'
path.- Existing logout logic in
UserEditButton.jsx
navigates to'/logout'
, which correctly routes to theLogoutPage
component.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of the LogoutPage component # Check if LogoutPage component file exists echo "Checking for LogoutPage component file:" fd LogoutPage.js$ src/pages/LogoutPage # Search for LogoutPage usage in routing echo "Searching for LogoutPage usage in routing:" rg --type js "LogoutPage" src/ -g "!src/pages/index.js" # Search for existing logout logic that might need updating echo "Searching for existing logout logic:" rg --type js "logout" src/ -g "!src/pages/LogoutPage/*"Length of output: 718
src/pages/LogoutPage/LogoutPage.jsx (3)
1-5
: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and necessary.The imports are logically ordered and include all the necessary dependencies for the component's functionality.
7-11
: LGTM: Component structure follows React best practices.The
LogoutPage
component is well-structured:
- It's a functional component.
- Hooks are correctly used at the top level.
- State and functions are extracted from the login store.
- The mutation is set up properly.
22-22
: LGTM: Correct export statement.The component is properly exported as the default export, which is the standard practice for a single component in a file.
src/pages/Layout.jsx (2)
9-9
: LGTM: Import statement for LoadingPage is correct.The import statement for
LoadingPage
is properly formatted and uses a relative path, which is appropriate for importing from the same directory. This import aligns well with the new conditional rendering logic in theLayout
component.
12-12
: Verify the extent of simplification in useUserData hook.The changes in this file align with the PR objective of simplifying the
useUserData
function. However, to ensure this fully addresses the mentioned simplification, we should verify the changes made to theuseUserData
hook itself.Let's check the implementation of the
useUserData
hook:This will help us confirm if the hook has been simplified as mentioned in the PR objectives.
src/router.jsx (1)
46-49
: LGTM! Consider authentication and placement.The new logout route is correctly structured and follows the pattern of other routes in the file. However, consider the following points:
- Authentication: Ensure that this route is properly protected or handles cases where a user is already logged out.
- Loader: Determine if a loader is needed for this route, similar to other routes in the file.
- Route Order: The placement at the end of the routes array (before the catch-all) is acceptable, but verify that this doesn't interfere with other route matching priorities.
To ensure consistency and proper implementation, run the following script:
β Verification successful
Logout route addition verified successfully.
The
LogoutPage
component is correctly implemented and utilized within the routing structure.
src/router.jsx
: Defines the 'logout' path with<pages.LogoutPage />
.src/pages/LogoutPage/LogoutPage.jsx
: Properly exports theLogoutPage
component.src/components/UserProfile/UserEditButton.jsx
: Navigates to '/logout' as intended.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the LogoutPage component and its usage # Test 1: Check if LogoutPage is exported from pages/index rg --type javascript 'export \{.*LogoutPage.*\}' src/pages/index.js # Test 2: Verify the implementation of LogoutPage fd LogoutPage.jsx -t f --exec cat {} # Test 3: Check for any existing logout-related logic in other components rg --type javascript 'logout|sign.?out' srcLength of output: 830
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the LogoutPage component and its usage with corrected file types # Test 1: Check if LogoutPage is exported from pages/index.js rg --type js 'export \{.*LogoutPage.*\}' src/pages/index.js # Test 2: Verify the implementation of LogoutPage fd LogoutPage.jsx -t f --exec cat {} # Test 3: Check for any existing logout-related logic in other components rg --type js 'logout|sign.?out' srcLength of output: 973
src/hooks/useUserData.js (4)
7-9
: Review the reducedstaleTime
andgcTime
valuesThe
staleTime
andgcTime
have been decreased from 60 minutes to 10 minutes. This change means the cached user data will become stale and be garbage collected more frequently, potentially increasing the number of network requests. Ensure that this aligns with your application's caching strategy and performance requirements.
7-7
: Ensure error handling is sufficient after removingisError
The
isError
variable has been removed from the destructured result ofuseKyQuery
, and the associated error handling logic has been eliminated. Verify that the application appropriately handles situations where fetching user data fails, and that this change does not lead to unexpected behavior when errors occur.
15-20
: Confirm the removal ofisLoading
from theuseEffect
dependenciesThe condition checking
isLoading
within theuseEffect
has been removed, and the dependency array has been simplified to[userData]
. Ensure that this does not cause unintended side effects, such as triggering state updates before the data is fully loaded.
22-22
: Verify that components consumeisLoading
appropriatelyThe hook now returns
isLoading
. Make sure that any components usinguseUserData
are updated to handle theisLoading
state properly, preventing potential issues with rendering or user experience before the data is loaded.
π μ°κ΄λ μ΄μ
π μμ λ΄μ©
π³ μμ λΈλμΉλͺ
hotfix
πΈ μ€ν¬λ¦°μ· (μ ν)
π¬ 리뷰 μꡬμ¬ν (μ ν)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
LogoutPage
component for handling user logout.Improvements
Bug Fixes