refactor(KL-130): change Product update http method #34
Conversation
- μν μ 보 μμ μ patch λμ put λ©μλ μ¬μ© - μμ² dtoλ₯Ό ProductCreateUpdateRequestDtoλ‘ ν΅μΌ - μν νλμ nullable, optional λͺ μμ μΌλ‘ μΆκ° - μν serviceμμ λ°ννλ μμΈ λͺ μμ μΌλ‘ μμ±
- μν pk νλ productIdμμ idλ‘ μμ
WalkthroughThe recent changes streamline the product management functionality within the application by consolidating the data transfer objects for product creation and updates into a single Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ProductController
participant ProductService
participant ProductRepository
Client->>ProductController: Create/Update Product Request
ProductController->>ProductService: createProduct(createRequest)
ProductService->>ProductRepository: save(product)
ProductRepository-->>ProductService: Product saved
ProductService-->>ProductController: Return Product Detail
ProductController-->>Client: Return Response
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/request/ProductCreateUpdateRequestDto.java (1)
21-21: Update method name for consistencyThe method name
testValidProductCreateRequestDtoinProductCreateUpdateRequestDtoTest.javashould be updated totestValidProductCreateUpdateRequestDtofor consistency with the new record name.
src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/request/ProductCreateUpdateRequestDtoTest.java: Update method nametestValidProductCreateRequestDtototestValidProductCreateUpdateRequestDto.Analysis chain
LGTM! Ensure consistency across the codebase.
The change from
ProductCreateRequestDtotoProductCreateUpdateRequestDtois approved.Verify that all instances of
ProductCreateRequestDtohave been updated toProductCreateUpdateRequestDtoacross the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all instances of `ProductCreateRequestDto` have been updated to `ProductCreateUpdateRequestDto`. # Test: Search for the old record name usage. Expect: No occurrences of `ProductCreateRequestDto`. rg --type java 'ProductCreateRequestDto'Length of output: 173
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the context of the occurrence of `ProductCreateRequestDto` in the test file. # Search for the old record name usage with context lines to understand its usage. rg --type java 'ProductCreateRequestDto' -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 1359
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/controller/ProductController.java (3 hunks)
- src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/domain/Product.java (3 hunks)
- src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/request/ProductCreateUpdateRequestDto.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductDetailResponseDto.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductSimpleResponseDto.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/service/ProductService.java (3 hunks)
- src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/controller/ProductControllerTest.java (8 hunks)
- src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/domain/ProductTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/request/ProductCreateUpdateRequestDtoTest.java (27 hunks)
- src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductDetailResponseDtoTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductSimpleResponseDtoTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/integration/ProductIntegrationTest.java (12 hunks)
- src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/service/ProductServiceTest.java (8 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/domain/ProductTest.java
Additional comments not posted (53)
src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductSimpleResponseDto.java (1)
24-24: LGTM! Ensure consistency across the codebase.The change from
product.getProductId()toproduct.getId()is approved.Verify that all instances of
product.getProductId()have been updated toproduct.getId()across the codebase.Verification successful
Verification successful.
The update from
product.getProductId()toproduct.getId()has been consistently applied across the codebase.
- Instances of
product.getId()found in:
src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductDetailResponseDtoTest.javasrc/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductSimpleResponseDto.javasrc/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductDetailResponseDto.javaScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all instances of `product.getProductId()` have been updated to `product.getId()`. # Test: Search for the old method usage. Expect: No occurrences of `product.getProductId()`. rg --type java 'product.getProductId()'Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all instances of `product.getProductId()` have been updated to `product.getId()`. # Search for the old method usage. Expect: No occurrences of `product.getProductId()`. rg --type java 'product.getProductId()' # Search for the new method usage to ensure it is being used correctly. rg --type java 'product.getId()'Length of output: 413
src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductDetailResponseDto.java (1)
38-38: LGTM! Ensure consistency across the codebase.The change from
product.getProductId()toproduct.getId()is approved.Verify that all instances of
product.getProductId()have been updated toproduct.getId()across the codebase.Verification successful
Verification successful.
The transition from
product.getProductId()toproduct.getId()has been consistently applied across the codebase.
src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductDetailResponseDtoTest.javasrc/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductSimpleResponseDto.javasrc/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductDetailResponseDto.javaScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all instances of `product.getProductId()` have been updated to `product.getId()`. # Test: Search for the old method usage. Expect: No occurrences of `product.getProductId()`. rg --type java 'product.getProductId()'Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all instances of `product.getId()` to ensure the transition from `product.getProductId()` was made correctly. # Test: Search for the new method usage. Expect: Multiple occurrences of `product.getId()`. rg --type java 'product.getId()'Length of output: 371
src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductSimpleResponseDtoTest.java (1)
25-25: LGTM!The change from
getProductId()togetId()aligns with the refactoring of theProductclass. The test logic remains correct.src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/controller/ProductController.java (4)
13-13: LGTM!The import of
PutMappingis necessary for the updated HTTP method in the controller.
24-24: LGTM!The import of
ProductCreateUpdateRequestDtois necessary for the consolidated DTO used in the controller methods.
60-60: LGTM!Updating the parameter type to
ProductCreateUpdateRequestDtoconsolidates the request data structure, simplifying the code and improving maintainability.
65-65: LGTM!Changing the HTTP method to
PUTaligns with RESTful principles. Updating the parameter type toProductCreateUpdateRequestDtoconsolidates the request data structure, simplifying the code and improving maintainability.Also applies to: 69-69
src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/response/ProductDetailResponseDtoTest.java (1)
35-35: LGTM!The change from
getProductId()togetId()aligns with the refactoring of theProductclass. The test logic remains correct.src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/domain/Product.java (6)
35-35: LGTM! Simplified identifier naming.The renaming of
productIdtoidsimplifies the identifier naming convention.
37-41: LGTM! Enforced non-null constraint for user association.The
@ManyToOne(optional = false)and@JoinColumn(nullable = false)annotations enforce that aProductcannot exist without a correspondingUser, improving data integrity.
87-91: LGTM! Enforced non-null constraint for city association.The
@ManyToOne(optional = false)and@JoinColumn(nullable = false)annotations enforce that aProductcannot exist without a correspondingCity, improving data integrity.
94-98: LGTM! Enforced non-null constraint for subcategory association.The
@ManyToOne(optional = false)and@JoinColumn(nullable = false)annotations enforce that aProductcannot exist without a correspondingSubcategory, improving data integrity.
101-105: LGTM! Enforced non-null constraint for currency association.The
@ManyToOne(optional = false)and@JoinColumn(nullable = false)annotations enforce that aProductcannot exist without a correspondingCurrency, improving data integrity.
162-168: LGTM! Simplified update method.The
updatemethod has been streamlined by removing conditional checks for null values and directly assigning parameters to fields, simplifying the method and reducing boilerplate code.src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/service/ProductService.java (8)
47-47: LGTM! Improved error handling in getProductById method.The
getProductByIdmethod now explicitly declares that it can throw aProductNotFoundException, improving error handling transparency.
54-55: LGTM! Consolidated request DTOs in createProduct method.The
createProductmethod now usesProductCreateUpdateRequestDto, reducing redundancy and simplifying the method signature.
61-65: LGTM! Consolidated request DTOs and improved error handling in updateProduct method.The
updateProductmethod now usesProductCreateUpdateRequestDtoand explicitly declares that it can throw aProductNotFoundException, improving error handling transparency.
76-92: LGTM! Consolidated request DTOs in createProductEntity method.The
createProductEntitymethod now usesProductCreateUpdateRequestDto, reducing redundancy and simplifying the method signature.
94-108: LGTM! Encapsulated update logic in updateProductEntity method.The
updateProductEntitymethod encapsulates the logic for updating a product, enhancing code organization and readability.
110-111: LGTM! Improved error handling in getCityEntity method.The
getCityEntitymethod now explicitly declares that it can throw aCityNotFoundException, improving robustness by enforcing error handling.
114-115: LGTM! Improved error handling in getSubcategoryEntity method.The
getSubcategoryEntitymethod now explicitly declares that it can throw aSubcategoryNotFoundException, improving robustness by enforcing error handling.
118-119: LGTM! Improved error handling in getCurrencyEntity method.The
getCurrencyEntitymethod now explicitly declares that it can throw aCurrencyNotFoundException, improving robustness by enforcing error handling.src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/service/ProductServiceTest.java (7)
27-27: LGTM! Consolidated request DTO imports.The import statements have been updated to use
ProductCreateUpdateRequestDto, reducing redundancy.
27-27: LGTM! Consolidated request DTO imports.The import statements have been updated to use
ProductCreateUpdateRequestDto, reducing redundancy.
82-82: LGTM! Updated mock product ID retrieval.The
setUpmethod now retrieves the mock product's ID usinggetId()instead ofgetProductId(), reflecting the updated method signature of theProductclass.
109-109: LGTM! Updated assertion in testGetAllProducts method.The
testGetAllProductsmethod now validates against the updated method signature, ensuring that the test remains valid and functional after the refactor.
124-124: LGTM! Updated assertion in testGetProductById method.The
testGetProductByIdmethod now validates against the updated method signature, ensuring that the test remains valid and functional after the refactor.
Line range hint
143-158:
LGTM! Updated testCreateProduct method.The
testCreateProductmethod now usesProductCreateUpdateRequestDto, streamlining the creation process and ensuring consistency in method calls.
Line range hint
179-201:
LGTM! Updated testUpdateProduct method.The
testUpdateProductmethod now usesProductCreateUpdateRequestDto, streamlining the update process and ensuring consistency in method calls.src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/integration/ProductIntegrationTest.java (6)
19-19: Import statement forProductCreateUpdateRequestDtois correct.The import statement is necessary for the usage of the consolidated DTO in the tests.
Line range hint
42-51: Correct usage ofProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestGetProductById.The method correctly uses the consolidated DTO to create and retrieve a product.
Line range hint
75-100: Correct usage ofProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestCreateProduct.The method correctly uses the consolidated DTO to create a product.
Line range hint
108-137: Correct usage ofProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestGetAllProducts.The method correctly uses the consolidated DTO to create and retrieve multiple products.
Line range hint
145-167: Correct usage ofProductCreateUpdateRequestDtoand HTTPPUTintestUpdateProduct.The method correctly uses the consolidated DTO and aligns with RESTful principles by using
PUTfor updates.
Line range hint
188-197: Correct usage ofProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestDeleteProduct.The method correctly uses the consolidated DTO to create and delete a product.
src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/request/ProductCreateUpdateRequestDtoTest.java (11)
20-20: Class name update toProductCreateUpdateRequestDtoTestis correct.The class name update is necessary to reflect the new DTO name.
Line range hint
31-43: Correct update to testProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestValidProductCreateRequestDto.The method correctly tests the validation of the consolidated DTO.
Line range hint
50-60: Correct update to testProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestNullProductName.The method correctly tests the validation of the consolidated DTO.
Line range hint
71-81: Correct update to testProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestEmptyProductName.The method correctly tests the validation of the consolidated DTO.
Line range hint
94-104: Correct update to testProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestProductNameOverMaxLength.The method correctly tests the validation of the consolidated DTO.
Line range hint
112-122: Correct update to testProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestNullProductDescription.The method correctly tests the validation of the consolidated DTO.
Line range hint
133-143: Correct update to testProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestEmptyProductDescription.The method correctly tests the validation of the consolidated DTO.
Line range hint
156-166: Correct update to testProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestProductDescriptionOverMaxLength.The method correctly tests the validation of the consolidated DTO.
Line range hint
174-184: Correct update to testProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestNullAddress.The method correctly tests the validation of the consolidated DTO.
Line range hint
195-205: Correct update to testProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestEmptyAddress.The method correctly tests the validation of the consolidated DTO.
Line range hint
214-224: Correct update to testProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestAddressUnderMaxLength.The method correctly tests the validation of the consolidated DTO.
src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/controller/ProductControllerTest.java (7)
28-28: Import statement forProductCreateUpdateRequestDtois correct.The import statement is necessary for the usage of the consolidated DTO in the tests.
Line range hint
174-204: Correct usage ofProductCreateUpdateRequestDtointestCreateProduct.The method correctly uses the consolidated DTO to create a product.
Line range hint
212-244: Correct usage ofProductCreateUpdateRequestDtoand HTTPPUTintestUpdateProduct.The method correctly uses the consolidated DTO and aligns with RESTful principles by using
PUTfor updates.
Line range hint
48-48: No changes related to DTO consolidation or HTTP method update.The method retrieves all products with default paging.
82-82: No changes related to DTO consolidation or HTTP method update.The method retrieves all products with custom paging.
Line range hint
116-116: No changes related to DTO consolidation or HTTP method update.The method retrieves a product by its ID.
Line range hint
251-251: No changes related to DTO consolidation or HTTP method update.The method deletes a product by its ID.
ohhamma
merged commit 9fe7c75
into
KL-71/μν-λͺ©λ‘-μ‘°ν-api-ꡬν
π μ°κ΄λ μ΄μ
π μμ λ΄μ©
PUTμ μ¬μ©νλλ‘ μμ productIdμμidλ‘ λ³κ²½π³ μμ λΈλμΉλͺ
KL-130/μν-μ 보-μμ -λ‘μ§-λ³κ²½πΈ μ€ν¬λ¦°μ· (μ ν)
π¬ 리뷰 μꡬμ¬ν (μ ν)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ProductCreateUpdateRequestDto.Bug Fixes
Tests