Add custom asset copy tweak

[mr-michael]

Let's change to:

✅ Asset already added.
If you're not seeing it, that means your balance is 0. Have a positive balance but still not seeing it? Make sure you've disabled the "Hide asset balances under $2" options from Settings and check the Wallet tab again.

[hyphenized]

I feel that the previous message conveyed this information better, although the copy was still wrong for the related setting. Note that the asset might not have been added, but already exists because it's part of a token list.

[jagodarybacka]

Yeah I think that message is too long, can we maybe split it into paragraphs or add a tooltip or Notion page about it?
cc @VladUXUI

[VladUXUI]

Users are trying to add an asset that already exists, this can be for 1 of 2 reasons:
1 - They have 0 balance so they don't see it
2 - They only have dust, need to toggle off "hide assets"

I feel like the previous version had a bit better context. The "title" reinforced the state of the asset and the body text provided a fix for the edgecases.

@mr-michael can you go provide a bit more context as to why you would like to change?

[Shadowfiend]

Is there a reason we wouldn't make this reactive to what we know? That is, tell them that they should see it/they can't see it because we know the balance is below $2 and they need to drop it/tell them they can't see it because balance is 0?

Additionally, it feels like we should forcibly display all assets the user has added explicitly even for a zero balance if that <$2 setting is off. I'm sure that conversation already happened and I'm a little late to it but--is that happening already, did we explicitly decide not to do that, or did we avoid it for technical reasons?

[hyphenized]

@VladUXUI Are there any UX concerns over making this reactive?

Additionally, it feels like we should forcibly display all assets the user has added explicitly even for a zero balance if that <$2 setting is off.

I think this is being handled here #3313

[VladUXUI]

@VladUXUI Are there any UX concerns over making this reactive?

Nope, having them be more specific should be awesome

[kkosiorowska]

@VladUXUI Are there any UX concerns over making this reactive?

Nope, having them be more specific should be awesome

We can therefore try to implement this.