Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(protocol): fix LibBlockHeader comment on EIP-1559 #13276

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

dionysuzx
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 9, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #13276 (5c62b37) into main (9cb1740) will decrease coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 5c62b37 differs from pull request most recent head 897b59f. Consider uploading reports for the commit 897b59f to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #13276      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   61.61%   61.50%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files         118      118              
  Lines        3478     3478              
  Branches      491      491              
==========================================
- Hits         2143     2139       -4     
- Misses       1250     1255       +5     
+ Partials       85       84       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
bridge-ui 94.52% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 9cb1740
protocol 52.15% <ø> (-0.23%) ⬇️
relayer 64.71% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 9cb1740
ui 100.00% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 9cb1740

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ackages/protocol/contracts/libs/LibBlockHeader.sol 92.30% <ø> (ø)
...es/protocol/contracts/thirdparty/LibMerkleTrie.sol 83.13% <0.00%> (-7.23%) ⬇️
...ges/protocol/contracts/libs/LibAnchorSignature.sol 100.00% <0.00%> (+10.52%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

dantaik
dantaik previously approved these changes Mar 9, 2023
packages/protocol/contracts/libs/LibBlockHeader.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
list = new bytes[](15 + extraCapacity);
} else {
// EIP1159 transaction
// EIP-1159 transaction
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto

@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ library LibBlockHeader {
// as [8]byte when hashing the block.
list[14] = LibRLPWriter.writeBytes(abi.encodePacked(header.nonce));
if (header.baseFeePerGas != 0) {
// non-EIP11559 transaction
// EIP-1159 transaction
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto

Co-authored-by: David <david@taiko.xyz>
@dantaik
Copy link
Contributor

dantaik commented Mar 9, 2023

Screenshot 2023-03-09 at 19 33 15

@davidtaikocha could you resolve this?

@davidtaikocha
Copy link
Member

Screenshot 2023-03-09 at 19 33 15

@davidtaikocha could you resolve this?

i believe all the changes in this pr have already been covered by #13278, so we can safely close this one?

@dantaik
Copy link
Contributor

dantaik commented Mar 9, 2023

Ok, lets close this one

@dantaik dantaik closed this Mar 9, 2023
auto-merge was automatically disabled March 9, 2023 12:58

Pull request was closed

@dionysuzx dionysuzx deleted the update-comment branch March 9, 2023 20:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants