Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(main): release protocol 1.3.0 #16697

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

taiko-kitty
Copy link
Contributor

@taiko-kitty taiko-kitty commented Apr 9, 2024

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

1.3.0 (2024-04-10)

Features

  • protocol: add TaikoL1.getTransition(blockId, transitionID) function (2c63cb0)
  • protocol: allow assigned prover to prove blocks outside proving window (liveness bond not returned) (2c63cb0)
  • protocol: allow bridge to fail a message by the owner without retrying it (#16669) (dce651e)
  • protocol: remove contestations from TransitionState and events (it's buggy) (2c63cb0)
  • protocol: use 35000 as gas limit for sending Ether in Brdge (#16666) (4909782)

Bug Fixes

  • protocol: add GovernorSettingsUpgradeable (#16687) (eba82ba)
  • protocol: check invocation gas limit also in retryMessage (#16660) (8209a43)
  • protocol: check no loops in multi-hop in Bridge (#16659) (447cd52)
  • protocol: fix potential 1271 signature replay if proposers are smart contracts (#16665) (2b27477)
  • protocol: return liveness bond only to assigned prover (2c63cb0)

This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

@taiko-kitty taiko-kitty force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--protocol branch from ca521a9 to fb49eaf Compare April 10, 2024 00:39
@taiko-kitty taiko-kitty force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--protocol branch from fb49eaf to 366cc69 Compare April 10, 2024 00:39
@dantaik dantaik merged commit 9257049 into main Apr 10, 2024
7 checks passed
@dantaik dantaik deleted the release-please--branches--main--components--protocol branch April 10, 2024 04:47
@taiko-kitty
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants