Skip to content

Provide a request / a statement object in noSQL API #212

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Totktonada opened this issue Aug 2, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Provide a request / a statement object in noSQL API #212

Totktonada opened this issue Aug 2, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@Totktonada
Copy link
Member

The alternative Java connector has ability to, say, construct update statement step-by-step. This can be more intuitive then our way.

Don't sure whether it worth to do so, looks as the minor improvement.

nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 4, 2019
Now client keeps actual schema metadata and sends schemaId header to be
checked against current Tarantool schema version. If client version
mismatches DB version client does schema reloading in the background.

Client operation interface was reworked in scope of support not only
number identifiers for spaces and indexes but also their string names.

This also includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Closes: #7, #137
Affects: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 4, 2019
Now client keeps actual schema metadata and sends schemaId header to be
checked against current Tarantool schema version. If client version
mismatches DB version client does schema reloading in the background.

Client operation interface was reworked in scope of support not only
number identifiers for spaces and indexes but also their string names.

This also includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Closes: #7, #137
Affects: #212
@rybakit
Copy link

rybakit commented Sep 5, 2019

For the record, the alternative PHP connector has this feature as well. It has the Operations class for update requests and Criteria for selects. Here are a few examples:

$result1 = $space->select(Criteria::key([1]));
$result2 = $space->select(Criteria::index('secondary')
    ->andKey(['bar'])
    ->andLimit(2)
    ->andOffset(1)
);
$result = $space->update([2], Operations::add(1, 5)->andSet(2, 'BAR'));

nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 5, 2019
Now client keeps actual schema metadata and sends schemaId header to be
checked against current Tarantool schema version. If client version
mismatches DB version client does schema reloading in the background.

Client operation interface was reworked in scope of support not only
number identifiers for spaces and indexes but also their string names.

This also includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Closes: #7, #137
Affects: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2019
Now client keeps actual schema metadata and sends schemaId header to be
checked against current Tarantool schema version. If client version
mismatches DB version client does schema reloading in the background.

Client operation interface was reworked in scope of support not only
number identifiers for spaces and indexes but also their string names.

This also includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Closes: #7, #137
Affects: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2019
Now client keeps actual schema metadata and sends schemaId header to be
checked against current Tarantool schema version. If client version
mismatches DB version client does schema reloading in the background.

Client operation interface was reworked in scope of support not only
number identifiers for spaces and indexes but also their string names.

This also includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Closes: #7, #137
Affects: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2019
Now client keeps actual schema metadata and sends schemaId header to be
checked against current Tarantool schema version. If client version
mismatches DB version client does schema reloading in the background.

Client operation interface was reworked in scope of support not only
number identifiers for spaces and indexes but also their string names.

This also includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Closes: #7, #137
Affects: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2019
Now client keeps actual schema metadata and sends schemaId header to be
checked against current Tarantool schema version. If client version
mismatches DB version client does schema reloading in the background.

Client operation interface was reworked in scope of support not only
number identifiers for spaces and indexes but also their string names.

This also includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Closes: #7, #137
Affects: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2019
Now client keeps actual schema metadata and sends schemaId header to be
checked against current Tarantool schema version. If client version
mismatches DB version client does schema reloading in the background.

Client operation interface was reworked in scope of support not only
number identifiers for spaces and indexes but also their string names.

This also includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Closes: #7, #137
Affects: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2019
Now client keeps actual schema metadata and sends schemaId header to be
checked against current Tarantool schema version. If client version
mismatches DB version client does schema reloading in the background.

Client operation interface was reworked in scope of support not only
number identifiers for spaces and indexes but also their string names.

This also includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Closes: #7, #137
Affects: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2019
This DSL includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Affects: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2019
This DSL includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Affects: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 19, 2019
This DSL includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Affects: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2019
This DSL includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Affects: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2019
This DSL includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Affects: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2019
This DSL includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Closes: #212
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2019
This DSL includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Closes: #212
@Totktonada
Copy link
Member Author

I propose to provide only new upsert operation in this API, see #248.

nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 26, 2019
This DSL includes set of request builders that can be used as a public
API to construct requests. The main idea here is to provide more
natural DSL-like approach to build operations instead of current
abstract types like List<?> or List<Object>.

Closes: #212
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants