Pre Release Zenodo Not Found

[atharva-2001]

📝 Description

Type: 🪲 bugfix | 🚀 feature | ☣️ breaking change | 🚦 testing | 📝 documentation | 🎢 infrastructure

https://github.com/tardis-sn/tardis/actions/runs/11108638074/job/30862049889
Should result in the pull request opening even if zenodo file not generated. I think pre release should pick up the default .zenodo file available.

📌 Resources

Examples, notebooks, and links to useful references.

🚦 Testing

How did you test these changes?

• Testing pipeline
• Other method (describe)
• My changes can't be tested (explain why)

☑️ Checklist

• I requested two reviewers for this pull request
• I updated the documentation according to my changes
• I built the documentation by applying the build_docs label

Note: If you are not allowed to perform any of these actions, ping (@) a contributor.

[tardis-bot]

*beep* *bop*
Hi human,
I ran ruff on the latest commit (44ea472).
Here are the outputs produced.
Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here.
Summarised output:

1	E999	SyntaxError: Expected an expression

Complete output(might be large):

.github/workflows/pre-release.yml:7:4: E999 SyntaxError: Expected an expression
Found 1 error.

[andrewfullard]

Why are we not getting a new zenodo.json made?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.51%. Comparing base (3b6084f) to head (44ea472).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2835      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.89%   70.51%   -0.39%     
==========================================
  Files         209      209              
  Lines       15589    15589              
==========================================
- Hits        11052    10992      -60     
- Misses       4537     4597      +60     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[tardis-bot]

*beep* *bop*
Hi human,
I ran benchmarks as you asked comparing master (3b6084f) and the latest commit (44ea472).
Here are the logs produced by ASV.
Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here.

Significantly changed benchmarks:

All benchmarks:

Benchmarks that have stayed the same:

| Change   | Before [3b6084f2] <master>   | After [44ea4729]    | Ratio   | Benchmark (Parameter)                                                                                                               |
|----------|------------------------------|---------------------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          | 481±200ns                    | 631±100ns           | ~1.31   | opacities_opacity.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaOpacities.time_compton_opacity_calculation                                      |
|          | 45.6±20μs                    | 58.6±20μs           | ~1.29   | transport_montecarlo_interaction.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloInteraction.time_line_emission                                         |
|          | 21.8±5μs                     | 19.6±4μs            | ~0.90   | transport_montecarlo_packet_trackers.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloPacketTrackers.time_generate_rpacket_last_interaction_tracker_list |
|          | 3.31±0.02ms                  | 2.68±0.01ms         | ~0.81   | opacities_opacity_state.BenchmarkOpacitiesOpacityState.time_opacity_state_initialize('scatter')                                     |
|          | 3.74±0.01ms                  | 4.09±0.01ms         | 1.09    | opacities_opacity_state.BenchmarkOpacitiesOpacityState.time_opacity_state_initialize('macroatom')                                   |
|          | 2.74±0.5μs                   | 2.94±0.3μs          | 1.07    | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_bad_vpacket                                       |
|          | 2.03±0.8μs                   | 2.09±1μs            | 1.03    | transport_montecarlo_estimators_radfield_estimator_calcs.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaPacket.time_update_line_estimators       |
|          | 631±200ns                    | 641±200ns           | 1.02    | opacities_opacity.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaOpacities.time_pair_creation_opacity_calculation                                |
|          | 561±200ns                    | 571±100ns           | 1.02    | opacities_opacity.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaOpacities.time_photoabsorption_opacity_calculation                              |
|          | 37.3±0.1s                    | 37.5±0.06s          | 1.01    | run_tardis.BenchmarkRunTardis.time_run_tardis                                                                                       |
|          | 209±0.06ns                   | 211±0.1ns           | 1.01    | spectrum_formal_integral.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloFormalIntegral.time_intensity_black_body                                       |
|          | 1.20±0μs                     | 1.21±0μs            | 1.01    | transport_geometry_calculate_distances.BenchmarkTransportGeometryCalculateDistances.time_calculate_distance_boundary                |
|          | 1.67±0ms                     | 1.68±0.01ms         | 1.01    | transport_montecarlo_main_loop.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloMontecarloMainLoop.time_montecarlo_main_loop                             |
|          | 1.03±0m                      | 1.03±0m             | 1.00    | run_tardis.BenchmarkRunTardis.time_run_tardis_rpacket_tracking                                                                      |
|          | 2.08±0m                      | 2.08±0m             | 1.00    | spectrum_formal_integral.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloFormalIntegral.time_FormalIntegrator_functions                                 |
|          | 44.4±20μs                    | 43.8±30μs           | 0.99    | transport_montecarlo_interaction.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloInteraction.time_line_scatter                                          |
|          | 3.67±0.1μs                   | 3.65±0.2μs          | 0.99    | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_vpacket_within_shell                              |
|          | 32.1±0.01μs                  | 31.1±0.03μs         | 0.97    | transport_montecarlo_packet_trackers.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloPacketTrackers.time_generate_rpacket_tracker_list                  |
|          | 6.21±0.8μs                   | 6.05±1μs            | 0.97    | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_vpacket                                           |
|          | 1.76±0.3μs                   | 1.69±0.3μs          | 0.96    | transport_geometry_calculate_distances.BenchmarkTransportGeometryCalculateDistances.time_calculate_distance_line                    |
|          | 65.3±0.1ms                   | 62.8±0.5ms          | 0.96    | transport_montecarlo_packet_trackers.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloPacketTrackers.time_rpacket_trackers_to_dataframe                  |
|          | 762±0.4ns                    | 711±0.2ns           | 0.93    | transport_montecarlo_interaction.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloInteraction.time_thomson_scatter                                       |
|          | 2.76±0.6ms                   | 2.56±0.4ms          | 0.93    | transport_montecarlo_single_packet_loop.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloSinglePacketLoop.time_single_packet_loop                        |
|          | 7.36±2μs                     | 6.85±1μs            | 0.93    | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_vpacket_volley                                    |

If you want to see the graph of the results, you can check it here