feat: add char-based API
#13
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Martin Kröning <martin.kroening@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de>
|
@mkroening Do we have to improve |
| Cp437(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP437, DECODING_TABLE_CP437), | ||
| Cp720(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP720, DECODING_TABLE_CP720), | ||
| Cp737(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP737, DECODING_TABLE_CP737), | ||
| Cp775(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP775, DECODING_TABLE_CP775), | ||
| Cp850(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP850, DECODING_TABLE_CP850), | ||
| Cp852(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP852, DECODING_TABLE_CP852), | ||
| Cp855(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP855, DECODING_TABLE_CP855), | ||
| Cp857(Incomplete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP857, DECODING_TABLE_CP857), | ||
| Cp858(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP858, DECODING_TABLE_CP858), | ||
| Cp860(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP860, DECODING_TABLE_CP860), | ||
| Cp861(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP861, DECODING_TABLE_CP861), | ||
| Cp862(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP862, DECODING_TABLE_CP862), | ||
| Cp863(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP863, DECODING_TABLE_CP863), | ||
| Cp864(Incomplete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP864, DECODING_TABLE_CP864), | ||
| Cp865(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP865, DECODING_TABLE_CP865), | ||
| Cp866(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP866, DECODING_TABLE_CP866), | ||
| Cp869(Complete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP869, DECODING_TABLE_CP869), | ||
| Cp874(Incomplete, ENCODING_TABLE_CP874, DECODING_TABLE_CP874), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wouldn't like to maintain these Complete/Incomplete and C[Pp]* written by hand if possible.
build.rs automatically generates ENCODING_TABLE_* and DECODING_TABLE_*.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm, so we might be able to move this macro call into build.rs. Is that what you had in mind?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is that what you had in mind?
Right. write_* functions are for code generation and you have only to modify (some of) them and maybe generate_tables.
I wonder if it's possible.
|
Our main dishes are |
Okay, we can make them private in favor of this API or what did you have in mind?
What do you mean? A user can choose not to use |
Hi Tatsunori,
It's been a while since I have worked on this. I prepared this code more than a year ago, but never got around to submitting it properly.
This API introduces newtypes around
u8s for working with these code points.Thanks for this crate! :)
Closes #10