Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: added note indicating that we update to reflect UTS 35/CLDR on an ad-hoc b… #779

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 17, 2023

Conversation

ben-allen
Copy link
Contributor

fix #584

@ben-allen ben-allen changed the title Editorial: added note indicating that we update to reflect UTS 35 on an ad-hoc b… Editorial: added note indicating that we update to reflect UTS 35/CLDR on an ad-hoc b… May 4, 2023
Co-authored-by: Jordan Harband <ljharb@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@FrankYFTang FrankYFTang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I think this is good because that will give all TG2 members a chance to express concern if UTS35 / CLDR add items implementation have issue to implement in term of both the timing or technical difficult (if that happen).

Copy link
Contributor

@gibson042 gibson042 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

spec/normative-references.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
remove explicit reference to UTS 35 and CLDR, allude to all listed standards instead

Co-authored-by: Richard Gibson <richard.gibson@gmail.com>
@gibson042 gibson042 merged commit 1bd572a into tc39:master Jun 17, 2023
@sffc sffc mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Formalize plan for ECMA-402 updates dependent on UTS 35
4 participants