PluralRuleSelectRange prose could be more concrete

[codehag]

The arguments are formatted a bit strangely -- it makes it seem like this is conditional on four arguments, not that the four arguments are required. In addition, we are not specifying the types here, as we do normally for AOs. We might want to make the prose more specific (it is a bit hand wavy right now). Finally, Doesn’t specify what it is returning.

A question from @ryzokuken: Why does PluralRulesSelectRange not have a ToParts?

[sffc]

The text for PluralRuleSelectRange is almost fully based on the pre-existing abstract operation PluralRuleSelect. I agree that it is too vague. I filed tc39/ecma402#593 to clean up both PluralRuleSelect and PluralRuleSelectRange.

A question from @ryzokuken: Why does PluralRulesSelectRange not have a ToParts?

ToParts is only relevant for string formatting, not plural rule selection.

[ryzokuken]

ToParts is only relevant for string formatting, not plural rule selection.

Oops, yes. Thanks for answering this!