Be more clear on valid return values for PluralRuleSelect #593
Labels
c: spec
Component: spec editorial issues
editorial
Involves an editorial fix
s: in progress
Status: the issue has an active proposal
Milestone
Reported by @codehag in tc39/proposal-intl-numberformat-v3#57
The abstract operation PluralRuleSelect does not clearly specify the set of valid return values, and it's not clear what the four arguments signify. This should be cleaned up with an editorial PR against ECMA-402. The PluralRuleSelectRange abstract operation in NFv3 should also be adjusted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: