-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pass the mode directly as a single string option instead of 2 bools #26
Conversation
|
||
<emu-clause id="sec-getoption" type="abstract operation"> | ||
<h1> | ||
GetOption ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why not use GetOption
for the mode
option? it would handle the default in a single step.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
GetOption
(taken from 402) coerces the value based on the third parameter. We have a normative convention to no longer do that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, but that suggests we should enhance GetOption to skip coercing, since we'll be using GetOption in Temporal anyways.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah sure, but again, that's in 402, so not really this proposal's problem. We'll have to figure out how to handle that editorially when merging temporal, since its coercion behaviour is presumably not changing to match our new conventions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair, but its coercion behavior should definitely be changing to match our new conventions - it hasn't shipped on the web yet so there's no reason not to do so.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're going to have to bring that up with the temporal people, not me. Also, they're not the only users. GetOption, with its current coercing behaviour, is used pretty extensively throughout 402 today: https://tc39.es/ecma402/#sec-getoption
e67dd9b
to
811b38a
Compare
No description provided.