Confirmed to keep non-existent properties

README.md

@@ -144,14 +144,11 @@ Object.pick({a : 1, b : 2}, (v, k) => k !== 'b'); // => {a: 1}
         ({a : 1, b : 2, c : 3}).{a, b : B}; // => {a: 1, B: 2}
         ```
 
-        Currently, there is a disagreement on whether properties with default assignment values should be picked.
+        ~~Currently, there is a disagreement on whether properties with default assignment values should be picked.~~ It has been reviewed in [#6](https://github.com/tc39-transfer/proposal-object-pick-or-omit/pull/6) which confirmed that the `.{...}` statement should denote what the new object should contain like restructuring:
 
         ```js
-        // If considering the meaning of picking, the initial value has no meanings
-        ({a : 1, b : 2, c : 3}).{a, d = 2}; // => {a: 1}
-
-        // If considering as "restructuring", the shortcut has its reason to pick
         ({a : 1, b : 2, c : 3}).{a, d = 2}; // => {a: 1, d: 2}
+        ({a : 1, b : 2, c : 3, d : 4}).{a, d = 2}; // => {a: 1, d: 4} 
         ```
 
     Nevertheless, it is just a simple vision, and feel free to discuss it.