Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace partial application implementation of fn.papp with with ? syntax #79

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 9, 2018

Conversation

btoo
Copy link
Contributor

@btoo btoo commented Jan 9, 2018

Because the proposal for the ? partial applications syntax is at a stage 1 proposal and includes examples directly related to how it would be used with the pipeline operator, I've updated the documentation to replace .papp with this method. I just wanted to see #33 reflected in the documentation because these features are really exciting :)

@littledan
Copy link
Member

Thanks for this update!

@littledan littledan merged commit 98410c9 into tc39:master Jan 9, 2018
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants