Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added range validation for BigInt data type. #504

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 21, 2017

Conversation

tvrprasad
Copy link
Contributor

This addresses #490 opened by @beautifulcoder

@arthurschreiber This fixes what amounts to data corruption on insertions, which makes it important to fix soon. But this is also a breaking change in terms of behavior. Any thoughts on if should we wait for 2.0 to check this in or get this into the up coming 1.x release?

@arthurschreiber
Copy link
Collaborator

This fixes what amounts to data corruption on insertions, which makes it important to fix soon. But this is also a breaking change in terms of behavior. Any thoughts on if should we wait for 2.0 to check this in or get this into the up coming 1.x release?

@tvrprasad I think this change in behaviour is fine, as it's more of a bug fix than a "real change". We should include this with the next 1.x release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants