Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use serviceAccountName instead of serviceAccount #495

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2019

Conversation

chmouel
Copy link
Member

@chmouel chmouel commented Dec 3, 2019

Changes

serviceAccount is not working anmore since 0.9.x let's rename it to serviceAccountName as it should be™️

Closes #494

Related proper long term detection of those failures: #496

/cc @vdemeester @hrishin @sthaha @danielhelfand

serviceAccount is not working since 0.9.x

Closes tektoncd#494

Signed-off-by: Chmouel Boudjnah <chmouel@redhat.com>
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 3, 2019
Copy link
Member

@danielhelfand danielhelfand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 3, 2019
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danielhelfand

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 3, 2019
@danielhelfand
Copy link
Member

/test pull-tekton-cli-unit-tests

@chmouel
Copy link
Member Author

chmouel commented Dec 3, 2019

/retest

🙄

we need to talk abotu those flaky tests at our first meeting agenda 🙏

@danielhelfand
Copy link
Member

/retest

🙄

we need to talk abotu those flaky tests at our first meeting agenda 🙏

Yes, it's always those same two unit tests.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 8fc7c4c into tektoncd:master Dec 3, 2019
@chmouel
Copy link
Member Author

chmouel commented Dec 3, 2019

We have talked a bit offline with @pradeepitm12 and @piyush-garg let's try to put this for next week agenda,

@chmouel chmouel deleted the issue-494-test-is-failing-du branch December 3, 2019 16:16
Copy link
Contributor

@piyush-garg piyush-garg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Test is failing due of output-resource-pipeline not being found
5 participants