[TEP-0079] Ownership and Maintenance #859
Conversation
tekton-robot
added
the
kind/tep
tekton-robot
added
the
size/XL
|
/assign @jerop Please check with Catalog WG for additional reviewers! |
|
cc @tektoncd/catalog-maintainers |
| feedback and iterate quickly. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Goals | ||
|
|
||
| #### Ownership and Maintenance | ||
|
|
||
| Every resource in the *Tekton Catalog* needs to have Owners to maintain them. The Ownership needs to be distributed among | ||
| community members and Tekton maintainers to ensure that the workload is manageable and sustainable. | ||
| Every resource in the [`tektoncd-catalog`](https://github.com/tektoncd-catalog) GitHub organization needs to have Owners to maintain them. The Ownership needs to be distributed among community members and Tekton Maintainers to ensure that the workload is manageable and sustainable. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should we also define how one can add their resource in https://github.com/tektoncd-catalog repository if they want to?
cc @jerop @vdemeester
There was a problem hiding this comment.
aah, just saw below that we won't be encouraging this 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's one reason to go to ArtifactHub, it's "easy" to get any task "indexed" (by ArtifactHub) without putting the burden on the tekton-catalog maintainers.
|
/assign |
tekton-robot
added
the
approved
|
|
||
| the [Tekton Catalog Maintainers][catalog-owners] also reserved the `tektoncd-legacy` org in the Hub, surfacing the current [centralized Catalog repo](https://github.com/tektoncd/catalog) following the legacy directory-based versioning. We will stop surfacing catalogs from the centralized Catalog repo in the Artifact Hub after the 9-month migration period as discussed in [TEP-0115][tep-0115-migration]. | ||
|
|
||
| #### CLI |
|
please take a look @vinamra28 /assign @vdemeester |
QuanZhang-William
force-pushed
the
tep-0079-ownership
branch
from
6c5252a
to
c9f219a
Compare
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| #### Community and Official Catalogs in Remote Resolution | ||
| Contributors can publish Tekton Bundles from their own Catalogs using the resources provided by Tekton e.g. there |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
are we allowing community users to publish their bundles on registry owned by Tekton? If not then should we be specific here that community catalogs can be published on any of the public registries which the OWNERS might have access to?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good point! I think community contributors should use their own registry. Update this section and PTAL 🙏
This commit updates the "Ownership and Maintenance" section of TEP-0079, reflecting recent changes in: - [TEP-0110][tep-0110]: Decouple Tekton Catalog Organization from Resource Reference - [TEP-0115][tep-0115]: Tekton Catalog Git-Based Versioning - tektoncd/hub#667: Migration from Tekton Hub to Artifact Hub This commit also renames the "official" support tier to "verified" to avoid naming confusion with the [official status][official-status] in Artifact Hub /kind tep [tep-0079]: https://github.com/tektoncd/community/blob/main/teps/0079-tekton-catalog-support-tiers.md [tep-0110]: https://github.com/tektoncd/community/blob/main/teps/0110-decouple-catalog-organization-and-reference.md [tep-0115]: https://github.com/tektoncd/community/blob/main/teps/0115-tekton-catalog-git-based-versioning.md [official-status]: https://artifacthub.io/docs/topics/repositories/#official-status
QuanZhang-William
force-pushed
the
tep-0079-ownership
branch
from
c9f219a
to
f03f355
Compare
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jerop, vdemeester, vinamra28 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
all assignees have approved, merging offline /lgtm |
Continue the work of #793
This commit updates the "Ownership and Maintenance" section of TEP-0079, reflecting recent changes in:
This commit also renames the
officialsupport tier toverifiedto avoid naming confusion with the official status in Artifact Hub/kind tep