Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix tests that were intermittently failing in CI #3441

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2024

Conversation

AlanGreene
Copy link
Member

Changes

These tests have been failing intermittently in CI for about a year now but until now had been unable to reproduce locally. For some unknown reason (suspect dependency updates) they became consistently reproducible locally this week, but were consistently passing in CI 🤷

Ensure all expected API calls are mocked for the error cases in the affected tests so that they behave predictably.

/kind misc

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Docs included if any changes are user facing
  • Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including
    functionality, content, code)
  • Has a kind label. You can add one by adding a comment on this PR that contains /kind <type>. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tep
  • Release notes block below has been updated with any user facing changes (new features, significant UI changes, API changes, bug fixes, changes requiring upgrade notices or deprecation warnings)
  • Release notes contains the string "action required" if the change requires additional action from users switching to the new release

Release Notes

NONE

These tests have been failing intermittently in CI for about a year
now but until now had been unable to reproduce locally. For some
unknown reason (suspect dependency updates) they became consistently
reproducible locally this week, but were consistently passing in CI
:shrug:

Ensure all expected API calls are mocked for the error cases in the
affected tests so that they behave predictably.
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. label May 29, 2024
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 29, 2024
@tekton-robot tekton-robot requested a review from skaegi May 29, 2024 13:43
@AlanGreene AlanGreene requested review from LyndseyBu and removed request for skaegi May 29, 2024 13:43
Copy link
Contributor

@briangleeson briangleeson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 29, 2024
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: briangleeson

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 29, 2024
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 34912d8 into tektoncd:main May 29, 2024
8 checks passed
@AlanGreene AlanGreene deleted the intermittent_ci_failures branch May 29, 2024 16:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants