Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A custom task check could be true, even though the Provided Spec is invalid. #4005

Merged

Conversation

ScrapCodes
Copy link
Contributor

@ScrapCodes ScrapCodes commented Jun 7, 2021

Changes

A custom task check could be true, even though the Provided Spec is invalid.
As a result: IsCustomTask returns true and rprt.Run may be nil. Pipelinerun controller crashes with nil dereference errors.

Fixed it by, adding a check for invalidSpec to IsCustomTask.

/kind bug

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Docs included if any changes are user facing
  • Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including
    functionality, content, code)
  • Release notes block below has been filled in or deleted (only if no user facing changes)

Release Notes

NONE

Spec is invalid.
As a result: IsCustomTask returns true and rprt.Run may be nil. Pipelinerun controller crashes with nil dereference errors.
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Jun 7, 2021
@tekton-robot tekton-robot requested review from pritidesai and a user June 7, 2021 08:41
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 7, 2021
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/resources/pipelinerunresolution.go 91.9% 91.9% 0.0

@ScrapCodes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-alpha-integration-tests

Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 7, 2021
@pritidesai
Copy link
Member

thanks @ScrapCodes

/approve

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pritidesai

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 7, 2021
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 9de68e3 into tektoncd:main Jun 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants