Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add examples for some resolvers #5451

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2022

Conversation

abayer
Copy link
Contributor

@abayer abayer commented Sep 7, 2022

Changes

Note that there's no bundles resolver example at all for Pipeline, because I can't find a publicly available bundle containing a Pipeline. Also, the cluster resolvers for both Pipeline and Task are in no-ci, since they require an existing Pipeline/Task in another namespace in the cluster, and I didn't feel comfortable adding a new namespace to those examples. The hub resolver example for Pipeline is in no-ci because it's using https://github.com/tektoncd/catalog/blob/main/pipeline/buildpacks/0.2/buildpacks.yaml, which requires various tasks already be present.

For the moment, the git resolver example for Pipeline is also in no-ci, but the new file ./test/resolvers_yaml/pipeline-in-git.yaml is intended to be used in an updated git resolver example once this is merged and can be referenced in the example.

Also fixes a mistake I made in docs/hub-resolver.md.

/kind misc

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Has Docs included if any changes are user facing
  • Has Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including
    functionality, content, code)
  • Has a kind label. You can add one by adding a comment on this PR that contains /kind <type>. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tep
  • Release notes block below has been updated with any user facing changes (API changes, bug fixes, changes requiring upgrade notices or deprecation warnings)
  • Release notes contains the string "action required" if the change requires additional action from users switching to the new release

Release Notes

NONE

@abayer abayer added the kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. label Sep 7, 2022
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. label Sep 7, 2022
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 7, 2022
@abayer abayer added this to the Pipelines v0.40 milestone Sep 7, 2022
@abayer
Copy link
Contributor Author

abayer commented Sep 7, 2022

/assign @lbernick @jerop @vdemeester

@abayer abayer force-pushed the add-remote-resolution-examples branch 2 times, most recently from ab5d495 to d27a8aa Compare September 7, 2022 21:11
@lbernick
Copy link
Member

lbernick commented Sep 8, 2022

would you mind also adding an example of how to replace a clustertask with the cluster resolver here?

@abayer
Copy link
Contributor Author

abayer commented Sep 8, 2022

would you mind also adding an example of how to replace a clustertask with the cluster resolver here?

oops! I forgot about that, will do.

Note that there's no bundles resolver example at all for Pipeline, because I can't find a publicly available bundle containing a Pipeline. Also, the cluster resolvers for both Pipeline and Task are in `no-ci`, since they require an existing `Pipeline`/`Task` in another namespace in the cluster, and I didn't feel comfortable adding a new namespace to those examples. The hub resolver for `Pipeline` are in `no-ci` because they're using https://github.com/tektoncd/catalog/blob/main/pipeline/buildpacks/0.2/buildpacks.yaml, which requires various tasks already be present.

For the moment, the git resolver example for `Pipeline` is also in `no-ci`, but the new file ./test/resolvers_yaml/pipeline-in-git.yaml is intended to be used in an updated git resolver example once this is merged and can be referenced in the example.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com>
@abayer abayer force-pushed the add-remote-resolution-examples branch from d27a8aa to 9eb5206 Compare September 8, 2022 15:24
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 8, 2022
@abayer
Copy link
Contributor Author

abayer commented Sep 8, 2022

/retest

Copy link
Member

@jerop jerop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for adding these examples @abayer!

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 8, 2022
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jerop, vdemeester

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 4cf8228 into tektoncd:main Sep 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants