Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

petite DAG - introduce key to identify node instead of holding a task #5468

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 15, 2022

Conversation

pritidesai
Copy link
Member

@pritidesai pritidesai commented Sep 9, 2022

Changes

A graph is built using all pipelineTasks from tasks section as nodes. A node includes a pipelineTask along with a list of parents (prev) and dependencies(next). The entire pipelineTask struct is not needed in building a graph since the list of dependencies is calculated outside of dag.build and passed as an additional parameter. This struct (pipelineTask) doesn't serve any purpose and not required in the node. The node now includes a key instead of Task.

For example, the DAG for this unit test now shows:

 Nodes: (map[string]*dag.Node) (len=6) {
  (string) (len=1) "a": (*dag.Node)(0xc000467900)({
   Key: (string) (len=1) "a",
   Prev: ([]*dag.Node) <nil>,
   Next: ([]*dag.Node) (len=2 cap=2) {
    (*dag.Node)(0xc000467940)({
     Key: (string) (len=1) "x",
     Prev: ([]*dag.Node) (len=1 cap=1) {
      (*dag.Node)(0xc000467900)(<already shown>)
     },
...

Instead of:

 Nodes: (map[string]*dag.Node) (len=6) {
  (string) (len=1) "a": (*dag.Node)(0xc0005ab780)({
   Task: (v1beta1.PipelineTask) {
    Name: (string) (len=1) "a",
    TaskRef: (*v1beta1.TaskRef)(<nil>),
    TaskSpec: (*v1beta1.EmbeddedTask)(<nil>),
    WhenExpressions: (v1beta1.WhenExpressions) <nil>,
    Retries: (int) 0,
    RunAfter: ([]string) <nil>,
    Resources: (*v1beta1.PipelineTaskResources)(<nil>),
    Params: ([]v1beta1.Param) <nil>,
    Matrix: (*v1beta1.Matrix)(<nil>),
    Workspaces: ([]v1beta1.WorkspacePipelineTaskBinding) <nil>,
    Timeout: (*v1.Duration)(<nil>)
   },
   Prev: ([]*dag.Node) <nil>,
   Next: ([]*dag.Node) (len=2 cap=2) {
    (*dag.Node)(0xc0005ab7c0)({
     Task: (v1beta1.PipelineTask) {
      Name: (string) (len=1) "x",
      TaskRef: (*v1beta1.TaskRef)(<nil>),
      TaskSpec: (*v1beta1.EmbeddedTask)(<nil>),
      WhenExpressions: (v1beta1.WhenExpressions) <nil>,
      Retries: (int) 0,
      RunAfter: ([]string) <nil>,
      Resources: (*v1beta1.PipelineTaskResources)(0xc00050d560)({
       Inputs: ([]v1beta1.PipelineTaskInputResource) (len=1 cap=1) {
        (v1beta1.PipelineTaskInputResource) {
         Name: (string) "",
         Resource: (string) "",
         From: ([]string) (len=1 cap=1) {
          (string) (len=1) "a"
         }
        }
       },
       Outputs: ([]v1beta1.PipelineTaskOutputResource) <nil>
      }),
      Params: ([]v1beta1.Param) <nil>,
      Matrix: (*v1beta1.Matrix)(<nil>),
      Workspaces: ([]v1beta1.WorkspacePipelineTaskBinding) <nil>,
      Timeout: (*v1.Duration)(<nil>)
     },
     Prev: ([]*dag.Node) (len=1 cap=1) {
      (*dag.Node)(0xc0005ab780)(<already shown>)
     },
...

/kind cleanup

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Has Docs included if any changes are user facing
  • Has Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including
    functionality, content, code)
  • Has a kind label. You can add one by adding a comment on this PR that contains /kind <type>. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tep
  • Release notes block below has been updated with any user facing changes (API changes, bug fixes, changes requiring upgrade notices or deprecation warnings)
  • Release notes contains the string "action required" if the change requires additional action from users switching to the new release

Release Notes

Replace holding a `Task` in `dag.Node` with a unique string identifier. 

A graph is built using all pipelineTasks from tasks section. A node is
identified using a pipelineTask along with a list of parents and dependencies.
The entire pipelineTask struct is not needed in building a graph since the
list of dependenices is passed as an additional parameter. There is no need to
hold this huge struct in the Node. The Node can be identified just using a key.
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. labels Sep 9, 2022
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 9, 2022
@pritidesai pritidesai added this to the Pipelines v0.40 milestone Sep 15, 2022
@abayer
Copy link
Contributor

abayer commented Sep 15, 2022

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@abayer: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-alpha-integration-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-build-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests
  • /test tekton-pipeline-unit-tests

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@abayer
Copy link
Contributor

abayer commented Sep 15, 2022

/approve

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abayer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 15, 2022
@dibyom
Copy link
Member

dibyom commented Sep 15, 2022

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 15, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jerop jerop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/test tekton-pipeline-unit-tests

cloud events flake 🤔

@pritidesai
Copy link
Member Author

thank you @abayer, @dibyom, and @jerop for reviews 👍

Unit tests failing with the known cloud event flake - #5160 😞

/test tekton-pipeline-unit-tests

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 1a1f2e3 into tektoncd:main Sep 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants