-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve how gosec G115 findings are addressed #8250
Improve how gosec G115 findings are addressed #8250
Conversation
Hi @SaschaSchwarze0. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a tektoncd member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test check-pr-has-kind-label |
@SaschaSchwarze0: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: vdemeester The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df |
@vdemeester: The specified target(s) for
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
/lgtm |
/retest |
/test pull-tekton-pipeline-beta-integration-tests |
/test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df |
@SaschaSchwarze0: The specified target(s) for
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
Changes
Gosec recently introduced the G115 rule for integer overflows. Making related changes:
nosec
is still required due to the lacking intelligence of gosec to recognize that this conversion is fine (or Go lacking parse functions for each bit size instead of one that at the end still always returns int64 ;-) )./cc vdemeester
/kind cleanup
Submitter Checklist
As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:
/kind <type>
. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tepRelease Notes