Skip to content

Conversation

@davidsoergel
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@davidsoergel davidsoergel requested a review from nfelt February 11, 2020 05:09
Copy link
Contributor

@nfelt nfelt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall looking good (thanks for the extensive protocol documentation!) - left some comments, feel free to let me know if this was already covered in previous conversations in design review / with @wchargin that I'm lacking context on.

Copy link
Member Author

@davidsoergel davidsoergel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the excellent comments! Made some changes; PTAL.

@davidsoergel davidsoergel requested a review from nfelt February 13, 2020 03:33
Copy link
Contributor

@nfelt nfelt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM modulo final comments.

Copy link
Member Author

@davidsoergel davidsoergel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review! And sorry for this churn, but the questions about crc32c, and about what to do with empty data or redundant data, inspired me to factor GetBlobMetadata out from WriteBlob. I think this is quite a bit clearer on all fronts.

@davidsoergel davidsoergel requested a review from nfelt February 13, 2020 20:42
Copy link
Contributor

@nfelt nfelt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@davidsoergel davidsoergel merged commit dc27e79 into master Feb 13, 2020
@davidsoergel davidsoergel deleted the write-service-blobs branch February 13, 2020 22:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants