We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Normally, I think JSTL need only at runtime time. Therefore I prefer it specify the runtime scope.
runtime
Current definition: (=compile scope is specified implicitly)
compile
terasoluna-gfw-web-blank/pom.xml
Lines 177 to 180 in fbb32ae
Modify as follow:
<dependency> <groupId>org.apache.taglibs</groupId> <artifactId>taglibs-standard-jstlel</artifactId> + <scope>runtime</scope> </dependency>
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
set test scope in jstlel #295
850c28b
set runtime scope in jstlel #295
c5685ff
Merge pull request #447 from terasolunaorg/issues/295_set_the_scope_o…
186bacf
…f_jstlel set runtime scope in taglibs-standard-jstlel #295
No branches or pull requests
Description
Normally, I think JSTL need only at runtime time.
Therefore I prefer it specify the
runtime
scope.Current definition: (=
compile
scope is specified implicitly)terasoluna-gfw-web-blank/pom.xml
Lines 177 to 180 in fbb32ae
Possible Solutions
Modify as follow:
<dependency> <groupId>org.apache.taglibs</groupId> <artifactId>taglibs-standard-jstlel</artifactId> + <scope>runtime</scope> </dependency>
What do you think?
Affects Version/s
Fix repositories
[ ] m-tIssue Links
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: