Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Support for scaling_configuration.seconds_before_timeout in Serverless V1 #461

Conversation

magreenbaum
Copy link
Member

Description

Support scaling_configuration.seconds_before_timeout in Aurora Serverless V1.

Motivation and Context

hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#38451

Breaking Changes

No.

How Has This Been Tested?

  • I have updated at least one of the examples/* to demonstrate and validate my change(s)
  • I have tested and validated these changes using one or more of the provided examples/* projects
  • I have executed pre-commit run -a on my pull request

@bryantbiggs bryantbiggs merged commit d798147 into terraform-aws-modules:master Jul 27, 2024
12 checks passed
antonbabenko pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2024
## [9.7.0](v9.6.0...v9.7.0) (2024-07-27)

### Features

* Support for `scaling_configuration.seconds_before_timeout` in Serverless V1 ([#461](#461)) ([d798147](d798147))
@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

This PR is included in version 9.7.0 🎉

@magreenbaum magreenbaum deleted the feat/scaling_configuration_seconds_before_timeout branch July 28, 2024 00:29
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 27, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants