Refactor CodePipeline pipeline and webhook resources to use keyvaluetags package and fix webhook resource recreation issues

[ewbankkit]

Community Note

• Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

Closes #8017.
Relates #10688.

Release note for CHANGELOG:

resource/aws_codepipeline_webhook: Don't recreate the resource if `tags` change
resource/aws_codepipeline_webhook: Do recreate the resource if `authentication_configuration` configuration block values (`allowed_ip_range` or `secret_token`) change

Output from acceptance testing:

$ make testacc TEST=./aws/ TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSCodePipeline_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws/ -v -count 1 -parallel 1 -run=TestAccAWSCodePipeline_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCodePipeline_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSCodePipeline_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCodePipeline_emptyArtifacts
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSCodePipeline_emptyArtifacts
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCodePipeline_deployWithServiceRole
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSCodePipeline_deployWithServiceRole
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCodePipeline_tags
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSCodePipeline_tags
=== CONT  TestAccAWSCodePipeline_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_basic (81.67s)
=== CONT  TestAccAWSCodePipeline_tags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_tags (115.91s)
=== CONT  TestAccAWSCodePipeline_deployWithServiceRole
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_deployWithServiceRole (61.23s)
=== CONT  TestAccAWSCodePipeline_emptyArtifacts
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_emptyArtifacts (52.73s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws	311.618s
$ make testacc TEST=./aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run=TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_basic (48.44s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_ipAuth
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_ipAuth (45.87s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_unauthenticated
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_unauthenticated (45.50s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_tags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_tags (98.33s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_UpdateAuthenticationConfiguration_SecretToken
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_UpdateAuthenticationConfiguration_SecretToken (69.85s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws	308.024s

[ewbankkit]

#### TODO

• Webhook tagsCAN be updated without recreating the resource
• Should be able to address aws_codepipeline_webhook doesn't support update #8017

[ewbankkit]

No need to recreate resource when tags change.

[ewbankkit]

Recreate resource when secret_token changes.

[ewbankkit]

Recreate resource when allowed_ip_range changes.

[ewbankkit]

Removed WIP.
Ready for review.

[bflad]

Looks great, thanks for these updates, @ewbankkit 🚀

Output from acceptance testing:

--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_emptyArtifacts (23.53s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_deployWithServiceRole (25.98s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_ipAuth (29.60s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_unauthenticated (32.22s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_UpdateAuthenticationConfiguration_SecretToken (38.70s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_tags (43.93s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_basic (49.31s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_basic (49.84s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipelineWebhook_tags (56.36s)

[ghost]

This has been released in version 2.45.0 of the Terraform AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template for triage. Thanks!

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!