In FindAllBy and FindAll query helper types: spread Arguments to support no arguments #1230
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What: Custom queries returned by
buildQueries
whose implementation required no arguments (besidescontainer
) still required one argument forfind*
andfindAll*
even when used onscreen
orwithin
.Without the
query-helpers.d.ts
changes introduced by this PR, see these TS errors in the updatedtype-tests
:Why: There was a lot of great work done on these types here and here, I want to build on that to solve this one additional edge case.
For context on why we have queries with no arguments: we have a library with UI components that other teams consume. We also provide a few custom queries for things we don't want the consumers to worry about. For example: We provide a
DataGrid
component with the option to select rows. It's possible to find the input to select a row using base testing-library features but consumers shouldn't need to know how the sausage is made, for their convenience we want them to be able to simply say:await userEvent.click(within(row).getGridRowSelectionInput())
This works, however I noticed that for the
find
andfindAll
queries the first arg is always required. It would end up looking like this to make TS happy:await within(row).findGridRowSelectionInput(undefined)
How: Spreading
Arguments
inFindBy
andFindAllBy
types would fix this; the resulting queries should better match the types passed intobuildQueries
. If there are no arguments aftercontainer
then the resulting query would have two:container
andwaitForOptions
. This would also allow for more than two args if needed. Lastly, this doesn't change the fact thatcontainer
is required:Checklist:
docs site N/A