-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 467
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test(role-helpers): improve coverage of logRoles fn #1248
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
test(role-helpers): improve coverage of logRoles fn #1248
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this one @naorpeled!
Left a minor comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR @naorpeled.
Because this PR contains 2 changes (types, and additional tests) I think it would be better to also create 2 focused PR.
This makes it easier to follow, and we have more control over the releases/history.
Fair point. |
@timdeschryver thanks for the great feedback. |
Co-authored-by: Tim Deschryver <28659384+timdeschryver@users.noreply.github.com>
Hey @timdeschryver, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Sorry, I missed the notification
All good :) |
What:
Increased the tests coverage of the logRoles and prettyRoles functions in the role helpers file,
at the moment cases with
hidden = true
option were not covered.Why:
To further understand the scope of #1201 I've added these tests, I think it's good to have them in the repo.
Checklist:
docs site