-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added Query Logging proposal #2694
Added Query Logging proposal #2694
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
uu, awesome! Will take a look before our meeting 🤗 We have busy week (F2F)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just skimmed but it looks good so far.
What I'd prefer is to split the document into two.
As we talked before let's focus on query logging and put the limiting aside for now. We can create another proposal for that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice! Some comments during our meeting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good job, looking good.
A section that I'd like to see is how to correlate logs from different components? How to track the logs of an individual query between different component?
And concerning audit logs; do we have a strategy to deal with sensitive data?
I would add a section regarding this shortly. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some comments during our offline meetings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe we should get this done and approved, and merged before getting into actual implementation (: This will avoid confusion we had in last middleware PRs (:
We can always iterate on this 💪
Test failure unrelated -
Edit : |
Signed-off-by: Yash <yashrsharma44@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yash Sharma <yashrsharma44@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yash Sharma <yashrsharma44@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yash Sharma <yashrsharma44@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yash Sharma <yashrsharma44@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yash Sharma <yashrsharma44@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yash Sharma <yashrsharma44@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yash Sharma <yashrsharma44@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yash Sharma <yashrsharma44@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yash Sharma <yashrsharma44@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yash Sharma <yashrsharma44@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yash Sharma <yashrsharma44@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yash Sharma <yashrsharma44@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🥇 LGMT. Let's merge it. If we discover any issues we can amend it later on.
Yayy!! |
Signed-off-by: Yash yashrsharma44@gmail.com
@bwplotka @kakkoyun