-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
store: add downloaded bytes limit #5801
Merged
GiedriusS
merged 8 commits into
thanos-io:main
from
GiedriusS:add_downloaded_bytes_limit
Oct 27, 2022
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d8fba06
store: add downloaded bytes limit
GiedriusS 2b33305
store: add bytesLimiter to LabelNames, LabelValues
GiedriusS ef85b17
test: add e2e test for new limiter
GiedriusS d50ec5a
*: update CHANGELOG/etc
GiedriusS 29b449e
e2e: hard fail on no error
GiedriusS 703ae31
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into add_downloaded_bytes_…
GiedriusS 59de426
CHANGELOG: fix & improve clarity
GiedriusS 488a687
Merge branch 'main' into add_downloaded_bytes_limit
GiedriusS File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about having a
nopLimiter
to avoid nil checks?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought it would be cleaner to add checks instead of passing
NewBytesLimiterFactory(0)(nil)
everywhere 😄 let me do this changeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we make the bytesLimiter an interface, then we don't need to pass the factory around right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But it is an interface already, no? I don't get your point. A
nopLimiter
is the same asNewBytesLimiterFactory(0)()
so I'm not sure what is the benefit of havingnopLimiter
. Problem is that you have to pass some kind of limiter in all places in all tests even though it is irrelevant. The purpose of thisif
is to avoid having to copy/paste that. Whether it isnopLimiter
orNewBytesLimiterFactory(0)()
it doesn't matter. Either way, let me make this changeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thought of a better idea - since it will be pretty much necessary to pass something here, I've made it into a "normal" argument to
NewBucketStore
. With this, it won't be needed to add a bunch ofif
s everywhere.