-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider to speed up the generating process #661
Comments
Test for cache-disabled. disable_cache.log $ hexo clean && time hexo generate > disable_cache.log 2>&1
INFO Deleted database.
INFO Deleted public folder.
real 10m40.752s
user 0m0.030s
sys 0m0.291s Test for cache-enabled. (didn't get the announced 3x speed-up.) $ hexo clean && time hexo generate > enable_cache.log 2>&1
INFO Deleted database.
INFO Deleted public folder.
real 7m58.032s
user 0m0.031s
sys 0m0.306s |
Same issue in all schemes. |
Scheme or theme? Is this a NexT specific problem? --- based on #539 , it seems to be.
Do your team has a plan for this? |
@Liam0205 issue will be fixed soon. I've already turnkey solution, need just to debug it. |
@ivan-nginx Glad to know! If there is any progress of it, or if any test task needed, please let me know. |
I think use
|
#969 I don't have any ideas now. . . |
So... how do
|
I agree and want to create new issue
Expected behavior
When I was using old version of NexT (0.x), generating 250+ posts costs around 1.4 minutes. I consider this is the expected behavior of Hexo generating speed.
Actual behavior
Now, generating 280 posts cost more than 7 minutes, and one day it costs me 20 minutes, which is not considered to be tolerated.
Steps to reproduce the behavior
What I've tried
Here are what I've tried:
NexT Scheme:
Hexo's and NexT's version number, configuration of Hexo and NexT, and environment information could be found in #658 .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: