Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ASoC: SOF: pm: don't return error when CTX_SAVE ipc fails #460

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2018

Conversation

ranj063
Copy link
Collaborator

@ranj063 ranj063 commented Dec 17, 2018

CTX_SAVE ipc is sent right before the DSP is powered off.
Returning an error if this ipc fails causes the resume
sequence to fail as well. Instead just report the error
and continue to power off the DSP. This is only a
temporary workaround until the real issue with
CTX_SAVE ipc's timing out is root caused.

Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com

Copy link
Member

@plbossart plbossart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that sounds either too good to be true or fishy?

@@ -318,10 +318,13 @@ static int sof_suspend(struct device *dev, bool runtime_suspend)
/* notify DSP of upcoming power down */
ret = sof_send_pm_ipc(sdev, SOF_IPC_PM_CTX_SAVE);
if (ret < 0) {
/*
* DSP will be powered off right after.
* So just report the error and continue.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That sounds like kicking the can down the read. If the IPC is not successful, doesn't it indicate trouble ahead on resume?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@plbossart this PR is by no means meant to address the underlying problem. I am only avoiding the problem that occurs when this IPC timesout for reasons not known so far. So it is only a workaround until the root cause is found. We're seeing repeated IPC timeouts on this particular iPC and if it times out, we reach a point of no recovery today.

@plbossart
Copy link
Member

plbossart commented Dec 18, 2018 via email

CTX_SAVE ipc is sent right before the DSP is powered off.
Returning an error if this ipc fails causes the resume
sequence to fail as well. Instead just report the error
and continue to power off the DSP. This is only a
temporary workaround until the real issue with
CTX_SAVE ipc's timing out is root caused.

Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
@ranj063
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ranj063 commented Dec 18, 2018

@plbossart fixed the comment and commit message now.

Copy link

@keyonjie keyonjie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a good workaround, our suspending is a special case, power off can recover kinds of errors we met and make driver more robust.

Furthermore, we can even add more ADSP reset(suspend/resume) at critical issues happening, e.g. DSP panic, IPC timeout, ...

/*
* DSP will be powered off right after.
* So just report the error and continue.
*/
dev_err(sdev->dev,
"error: ctx_save ipc error during suspend %d\n",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"but we will continue power off Audio DSP..."

@plbossart
Copy link
Member

@keyonjie "Furthermore, we can even add more ADSP reset(suspend/resume) at critical issues happening, e.g. DSP panic, IPC timeout, ..." -> this is what I meant in #452. If we are stuck, timed-out, etc, we reset and restart the firmware

@plbossart plbossart merged commit 007f8fe into thesofproject:topic/sof-dev Dec 18, 2018
@ranj063 ranj063 deleted the fix/ctx_save_ipc branch March 22, 2019 17:08
jason77-wang pushed a commit to jason77-wang/linux-1 that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2020
The port->hsr is used in the hsr_handle_frame(), which is a
callback of rx_handler.
hsr master and slaves are initialized in hsr_add_port().
This function initializes several pointers, which includes port->hsr after
registering rx_handler.
So, in the rx_handler routine, un-initialized pointer would be used.
In order to fix this, pointers should be initialized before
registering rx_handler.

Test commands:
    ip netns del left
    ip netns del right
    modprobe -rv veth
    modprobe -rv hsr
    killall ping
    modprobe hsr
    ip netns add left
    ip netns add right
    ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1
    ip link add veth2 type veth peer name veth3
    ip link add veth4 type veth peer name veth5
    ip link set veth1 netns left
    ip link set veth3 netns right
    ip link set veth4 netns left
    ip link set veth5 netns right
    ip link set veth0 up
    ip link set veth2 up
    ip link set veth0 address fc:00:00:00:00:01
    ip link set veth2 address fc:00:00:00:00:02
    ip netns exec left ip link set veth1 up
    ip netns exec left ip link set veth4 up
    ip netns exec right ip link set veth3 up
    ip netns exec right ip link set veth5 up
    ip link add hsr0 type hsr slave1 veth0 slave2 veth2
    ip a a 192.168.100.1/24 dev hsr0
    ip link set hsr0 up
    ip netns exec left ip link add hsr1 type hsr slave1 veth1 slave2 veth4
    ip netns exec left ip a a 192.168.100.2/24 dev hsr1
    ip netns exec left ip link set hsr1 up
    ip netns exec left ip n a 192.168.100.1 dev hsr1 lladdr \
	    fc:00:00:00:00:01 nud permanent
    ip netns exec left ip n r 192.168.100.1 dev hsr1 lladdr \
	    fc:00:00:00:00:01 nud permanent
    for i in {1..100}
    do
        ip netns exec left ping 192.168.100.1 &
    done
    ip netns exec left hping3 192.168.100.1 -2 --flood &
    ip netns exec right ip link add hsr2 type hsr slave1 veth3 slave2 veth5
    ip netns exec right ip a a 192.168.100.3/24 dev hsr2
    ip netns exec right ip link set hsr2 up
    ip netns exec right ip n a 192.168.100.1 dev hsr2 lladdr \
	    fc:00:00:00:00:02 nud permanent
    ip netns exec right ip n r 192.168.100.1 dev hsr2 lladdr \
	    fc:00:00:00:00:02 nud permanent
    for i in {1..100}
    do
        ip netns exec right ping 192.168.100.1 &
    done
    ip netns exec right hping3 192.168.100.1 -2 --flood &
    while :
    do
        ip link add hsr0 type hsr slave1 veth0 slave2 veth2
	ip a a 192.168.100.1/24 dev hsr0
	ip link set hsr0 up
	ip link del hsr0
    done

Splat looks like:
[  120.954938][    C0] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000006: 0000 [thesofproject#1]I
[  120.957761][    C0] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000030-0x0000000000000037]
[  120.959064][    C0] CPU: 0 PID: 1511 Comm: hping3 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc5+ thesofproject#460
[  120.960054][    C0] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[  120.962261][    C0] RIP: 0010:hsr_addr_is_self+0x65/0x2a0 [hsr]
[  120.963149][    C0] Code: 44 24 18 70 73 2f c0 48 c1 eb 03 48 8d 04 13 c7 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 c7 40 04 00 f2 f2 f2 4
[  120.966277][    C0] RSP: 0018:ffff8880d9c09af0 EFLAGS: 00010206
[  120.967293][    C0] RAX: 0000000000000006 RBX: 1ffff1101b38135f RCX: 0000000000000000
[  120.968516][    C0] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffff8880d17cb208 RDI: 0000000000000000
[  120.969718][    C0] RBP: 0000000000000030 R08: ffffed101b3c0e3c R09: 0000000000000001
[  120.972203][    C0] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed101b3c0e3b R12: 0000000000000000
[  120.973379][    C0] R13: ffff8880aaf80100 R14: ffff8880aaf800f2 R15: ffff8880aaf80040
[  120.974410][    C0] FS:  00007f58e693f740(0000) GS:ffff8880d9c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  120.979794][    C0] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  120.980773][    C0] CR2: 00007ffcb8b38f29 CR3: 00000000afe8e001 CR4: 00000000000606f0
[  120.981945][    C0] Call Trace:
[  120.982411][    C0]  <IRQ>
[  120.982848][    C0]  ? hsr_add_node+0x8c0/0x8c0 [hsr]
[  120.983522][    C0]  ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x90/0xa0
[  120.984159][    C0]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xc0/0xc0
[  120.984944][    C0]  hsr_handle_frame+0x1db/0x4e0 [hsr]
[  120.985597][    C0]  ? hsr_nl_nodedown+0x2b0/0x2b0 [hsr]
[  120.986289][    C0]  __netif_receive_skb_core+0x6bf/0x3170
[  120.992513][    C0]  ? check_chain_key+0x236/0x5d0
[  120.993223][    C0]  ? do_xdp_generic+0x1460/0x1460
[  120.993875][    C0]  ? register_lock_class+0x14d0/0x14d0
[  120.994609][    C0]  ? __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x8d/0x160
[  120.995377][    C0]  __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x8d/0x160
[  120.996204][    C0]  ? __netif_receive_skb_core+0x3170/0x3170
[ ... ]

Reported-by: syzbot+fcf5dd39282ceb27108d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: c5a7591 ("net/hsr: Use list_head (and rcu) instead of array for slave devices.")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants