Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 19, 2021. It is now read-only.

AppImage fails to run on Ubuntu #25

Closed
probonopd opened this issue Sep 8, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #29
Closed

AppImage fails to run on Ubuntu #25

probonopd opened this issue Sep 8, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #29

Comments

@probonopd
Copy link

/run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/AppRun: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.27' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/usr/bin/../lib/libSDL2-2.0.so.0)

/run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/AppRun: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/usr/bin/../lib/libcrypto.so.1.1)

/run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/AppRun: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/usr/bin/../lib/libQt5Core.so.5)

/run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/AppRun: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1: version `ZLIB_1.2.9' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/usr/bin/../lib/libpng16.so.16)

/run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/AppRun: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.27' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/usr/bin/../lib/libpulsecommon-11.1.so)

/run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/AppRun: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/usr/bin/../lib/libbsd.so.0)

/run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/AppRun: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/usr/bin/../lib/libsystemd.so.0)

/run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/AppRun: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.27' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/.appimage-9021/usr/bin/../lib/libsystemd.so.0)

Please compile on Ubuntu Xenial or earlier.

Reference:
AppImage/appimage.github.io#1728

@thestr4ng3r
Copy link
Owner

Thanks, I will consider moving to xenial for the next release.

@probonopd
Copy link
Author

Thank you very much. It is working now.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants