Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adjust to removals from securesystemslib #855

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2019
Merged

Adjust to removals from securesystemslib #855

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2019

Conversation

awwad
Copy link
Contributor

@awwad awwad commented Apr 16, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Removal of securesystemslib exceptions that are TUF-specific occurs in securesystemslib PR #165.

This PR adapts to those changes. Exceptions that are specific to TUF should be in TUF and not in securesystemslib. This commit uses those already-existing TUF exceptions instead of pointing to securesystemslib exceptions that will be removed.

For example, securesystemslib has no notion of repositories, so it's clearly wrong to have a RepositoryError in securesystemslib and clearly wrong for TUF to use securesystemslib.exceptions.RepositoryError.

  • The code follows the Code Style Guidelines
  • Tests have been added for the bug fix or new feature
  • Docs have been added for the bug fix or new feature

@awwad awwad mentioned this pull request Apr 16, 2019
Merged
@awwad awwad force-pushed the adjust_to_removals_from_securesystemslib branch from a0b52b4 to d02ac94 Compare April 16, 2019 21:04
@awwad awwad mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2019
Merged
@joshuagl joshuagl mentioned this pull request Sep 16, 2019
Closed
@lukpueh lukpueh force-pushed the adjust_to_removals_from_securesystemslib branch from d02ac94 to 0b592b9 Compare September 17, 2019 09:16
@awwad @lukpueh
Use TUF exceptions instead of SSL exceptions where appropriate
a9d7053 
Removal of securesystemslib exceptions that are TUF-specific
occurs in securesystemslib PR #165
secure-systems-lab/securesystemslib#165

This commit adapts to those changes.  Exceptions that are specific
to TUF should be in TUF and not in securesystemslib.  This commit
uses those already-existing TUF exceptions instead of pointing to
securesystemslib exceptions that will be removed.

For example, securesystemslib has no notion of repositories, so
it's ridiculous to have a RepositoryError in securesystemslib and
ridiculous for TUF to use
securesystemslib.exceptions.RepositoryError.

Signed-off-by: Sebastien Awwad <sebastien.awwad@gmail.com>
@lukpueh lukpueh force-pushed the adjust_to_removals_from_securesystemslib branch from 0b592b9 to a9d7053 Compare September 17, 2019 09:21
lukpueh
lukpueh approved these changes Sep 17, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@lukpueh lukpueh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After rebasing to solve a minor docstring conflict this PR looks good to me:

secure-systems-lab/securesystemslib#165 removed the following custom error classes from securesystemslib as TUF-specific:
BadVersionNumberError, DownloadError, ExpiredMetadataError, ForbiddenTargetError, InsufficientKeysError, KeyAlreadyExistsError, RepositoryError, RoleAlreadyExistsError, UnknownKeyError, UnknownRoleError, UnknownTargetError

All these error classes already existed in tuf.exceptions, and were either already used from there:
DownloadError, ExpiredMetadataError, ForbiddenTargetError, RoleAlreadyExistsError
... or are now (with this PR):
BadVersionNumberError, InsufficientKeysError, KeyAlreadyExistsError, RepositoryError, UnknownKeyError, UnknownRoleError, UnknownTargetError

@lukpueh lukpueh merged commit 6a145d0 into develop Sep 17, 2019
trishankatdatadog added a commit to theupdateframework/specification that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2019
@trishankatdatadog
Consistent snapshots for root metadata
eb2927e 
discovery from [theupdateframework/python-tuf#855](theupdateframework/python-tuf#855)
@trishankatdatadog trishankatdatadog mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2019
Merged
@trishankatdatadog trishankatdatadog deleted the adjust_to_removals_from_securesystemslib branch November 5, 2019 15:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lukpueh lukpueh lukpueh approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@awwad @lukpueh