Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO NOT MERGE] Review rebased draft #228

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

lukpueh
Copy link
Member

@lukpueh lukpueh commented May 24, 2022

The draft branch is notoriously lagging behind (currently 39 commits). This PR shows the rebased draft branch against the up-to-date master. Its diff should look roughly the same as old draft against old master, modulo some changes due to resolving rebase conflicts.

Upon approval I will force-push draft rather than merging this PR.

lukpueh and others added 3 commits May 24, 2022 12:03
Update "4.5. File formats: targets.json and delegated target roles"
to reflect metadata format introduced by TAP 3
Clarify in step 5.6.7.2.1 of the client workflow that in a multi-role
delegation not each but rather a defined threshold of roles must
agree on the target hashes and lengths (see `min_roles_in_agreement`).
`keys_for_delegations` --> `keys`
(the keys field in root.json in reality also lists "keys for
delegations", i.e. keys to delegate trust to other top-level roles,
but is only called keys)

`roleinfo` --> `roles`
(keeping the name for delegated roles as it was before TAP3)
Copy link
Member

@JustinCappos JustinCappos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look good to me.

@lukpueh
Copy link
Member Author

lukpueh commented May 24, 2022

Thanks, @JustinCappos! draft is now only ahead and no longer behind master:

Screen Shot 2022-05-24 at 15 35 50

@lukpueh lukpueh closed this May 24, 2022
@joshuagl
Copy link
Member

Many thanks for doing the work here @lukpueh! We really need that automation :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants