Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: fix typo in async_hooks.md #6

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

doc: fix typo in async_hooks.md #6

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion doc/api/async_hooks.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ Now if we only use `scope` to graph resource allocation we get the following:
TTYWRAP(6) -> Timeout(4) -> TIMERWRAP(5) -> TickObject(3) -> root(1)
```

The `TCPWRAP` isn't part of this graph; evne though it was the reason for
The `TCPWRAP` isn't part of this graph; even though it was the reason for
`console.log()` being called. This is because binding to a port without a
hostname is actually synchronous, but to maintain a completely asynchronous API
the user's callback is placed in a `process.nextTick()`.
Expand Down