-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
perf: improve lock contention and async overhead #3693
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
7db8996 to
bfd22ca
Compare
|
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job PR Review: Performance Improvements to Lock Contention and Async OverheadI've completed my analysis of the performance optimization changes in this PR. Here's my comprehensive review: Todo List:
🚀 Overall Assessment: EXCELLENTThis PR demonstrates exceptional understanding of .NET performance optimization principles. The changes systematically address multiple performance bottlenecks with well-thought-out solutions. ✅ Strengths1. Intelligent Parallelism Strategy (TestScheduler.cs:375-491)// PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION: Partition tests by whether they have parallel limiters
var testsWithLimiters = new List<AbstractExecutableTest>();
var testsWithoutLimiters = new List<AbstractExecutableTest>();Excellent approach! Partitioning tests by limiter requirements eliminates unnecessary semaphore overhead for unlimited tests while properly constraining limited ones. 2. Lock-Free Object Pooling (HashSetPool.cs)private readonly ConcurrentDictionary<Type, ConcurrentBag<object>> _pools = new();Smart choice! Using 3. Async Optimization (TestScheduler.cs:228-230)// Use async signaling instead of polling to eliminate IOCP overhead
while (await _dynamicTestQueue.WaitToReadAsync(cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false))Excellent async pattern! Replacing polling with 4. Parallel.ForEachAsync Adoption (TestScheduler.cs:306-316)await Parallel.ForEachAsync(
tests,
new ParallelOptions { CancellationToken = cancellationToken },
async (test, ct) => { /* ... */ }
).ConfigureAwait(false);Modern and efficient! This eliminates unbounded 5. Lazy Initialization Optimization (DataSourceInitializer.cs:45-47)var lazyTask = _initializationTasks.GetOrAdd(
dataSource,
_ => new Lazy<Task>(() => InitializeDataSourceAsync(/* ... */)));Thread-safe and efficient! Using 🎯 Performance Impact Analysis
🔒 Security Assessment: SECURE
🐛 Potential Issues & SuggestionsMinor: HashSetPool.cs Type Safety// Current (line 21)
var set = (HashSet<T>)pooledSet;
// Consider: Runtime type checking for robustness
if (pooledSet is HashSet<T> set) { /* use set */ }
else { /* fallback to new */ }Minor: DataSourceInitializer.cs Cancellation Pattern// Lines 52-60: Consider simplifying
if (cancellationToken.CanBeCanceled)
{
await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
cancellationToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();
}Could be simplified to just 🧪 Test Coverage ConsiderationsThe changes are internal optimizations that shouldn't affect external behavior. However, consider:
📊 Code Quality: EXCELLENT
🎉 Recommendations
SummaryThis PR represents sophisticated performance engineering. The author demonstrates deep understanding of:
The changes should provide measurable performance improvements in high-concurrency test execution scenarios while maintaining code quality and safety. Verdict: ✅ APPROVE - Excellent performance optimizations with no significant risks |
No description provided.