Anonymous functions work #163
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hadley
reviewed
Aug 19, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good — could you please add a bullet to the top of NEWS.md? It should briefly describe the change and end with (@yourname, #issuenumber).
|
Thanks @smingerson! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
(Partially?) closes #155. I could not recreate the other situations the issue author says sometimes did or did not work.
Prior to this change, anonymous functions fell into the default case of
dt_squash(), which led to an error. Now, they are identified as function calls.Added a simple test case, happy to add more if you think they are needed, such as testing use in
mutate()/summarise()