-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pathGrob usage failure #3312
Comments
I’ll take this once I get on top — this is my code all the way down |
ok, so this is the same story as I had with sf, back when I added the new pathGrob capabilities... for weird reasons ggplot2 does not itself trigger this build warning, but packages subclassing polygonGrob will... The fix is to mask pathGrob so it doesn't get called directly (this is super stupid as the current code is correct, but the static analyser is throwing a fit)... copying the sf approach should fix it I hope someone else can take this up as my head is still not happy about prolonged computer use (reading is better than actively working) |
Just clarifying...this is something we don't have to fix in ggplot2, we just have to notify the downstream package developers? If so, I'd be happy to do this. |
We should do this in ggplot2. ggforce doesn’t call |
…class GeomPolygon from throwing an install warning. Fixes tidyverse#3312.
This old issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with reprex) and link to this issue. https://reprex.tidyverse.org/ |
This is a revdep issue (#3303) in which there is an installation warning about
pathGrob()
not having apathId
argument:This affects ggalt, ggforce, ggpol, ggpolypath, ggsolvencyii, and ggspatial. I'm guessing this has to do with #3128 (this is why ggspatial is using
pathGrob
...to put holes in polygons), but I don't know why.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: