Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v1.36] Regenerate CRDs #3537

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024
Merged

[v1.36] Regenerate CRDs #3537

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

fasaxc
Copy link
Member

@fasaxc fasaxc commented Oct 11, 2024

Description

For PR author

  • Tests for change.
  • If changing pkg/apis/, run make gen-files
  • If changing versions, run make gen-versions

For PR reviewers

A note for code reviewers - all pull requests must have the following:

  • Milestone set according to targeted release.
  • Appropriate labels:
    • kind/bug if this is a bugfix.
    • kind/enhancement if this is a a new feature.
    • enterprise if this PR applies to Calico Enterprise only.

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ metadata:
annotations:
api-approved.kubernetes.io: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/network-policy-api/pull/30
policy.networking.k8s.io/bundle-version: v0.1.1
policy.networking.k8s.io/channel: standard
policy.networking.k8s.io/channel: experimental
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems the wrong direction to change this to experimental when standard was here before, though I guess we haven't make AdminNetworkPolicies available before so I guess it is ok for this value to change. I assume this has been reviewed in Calico also.

Copy link
Member

@tmjd tmjd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@fasaxc
Copy link
Member Author

fasaxc commented Oct 14, 2024

I think we started off with the conservative "standard" ANP spec and moved to the experimental one because the conservative one was missing some newer additions that we wanted to implement.

@fasaxc fasaxc merged commit bbe1ca0 into tigera:release-v1.36 Oct 14, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants