-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
Update readme #170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update readme #170
Conversation
e07c953
to
581e626
Compare
Signed-off-by: ekexium <ekexium@gmail.com>
581e626
to
316a194
Compare
Signed-off-by: ekexium <ekexium@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: ekexium <ekexium@gmail.com>
@nrc I added some content. Could you take another look? |
Signed-off-by: ekexium <ekexium@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: ekexium <ekexium@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: ekexium <ekexium@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, just one typo, then land it.
re batch_scan/each_limit, is this behaviour specific to the Rust client? Does something else happen in TiDB?
README.md
Outdated
| `batch_get` | `Iter<Key>` | `Iter<KvPair>` | Skip non-existent keys; Does not retain order | | ||
| `lock_keys` | `KvPair` | `()` | | | ||
|
||
For detailed behavior of each reqeust, please refer to the [doc](#Access-the-documentation). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For detailed behavior of each reqeust, please refer to the [doc](#Access-the-documentation). | |
For detailed behavior of each request, please refer to the [doc](#Access-the-documentation). | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
batch_scan
is a raw request. So TiDB should not have this problem.
Update dependency, limit and add simple code examples.