-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 727
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
checker: replace down check with disconnect check when fixing orphan peer #7294
Conversation
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
ruleCheckerRemoveOrphanPeerCounter.Inc() | ||
return operator.CreateRemovePeerOperator("remove-orphan-peer", c.cluster, 0, region, orphanPeer.StoreId) | ||
checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "remove-orphan-peer").Inc() | ||
return operator.CreateRemovePeerOperator("remove-unhealthy-orphan-peer", c.cluster, 0, region, orphanPeer.StoreId) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
use "remove-unhealthy-orphan-peer" and "remove-disconnected-orphan-peer" to distinguish
// down peer's store should be down. | ||
if !c.isStoreDownTimeHitMaxDownTime(pinDownPeer.GetStoreId()) { | ||
// down peer's store should be disconnected | ||
if !isDisconnectedPeer(pinDownPeer) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
use isDisconnectedPeer
rather than isStoreDownTimeHitMaxDownTime
, because we use stricter check in isDisconnectedPeer
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7294 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.48% 74.46% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 446 446
Lines 48339 48346 +7
==========================================
- Hits 36003 36001 -2
- Misses 9161 9167 +6
- Partials 3175 3178 +3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@nolouch ptal |
/merge |
@lhy1024: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 4f1c5cb
|
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: Close #7249
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Release note