Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mcs: support ttl config #7409

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023
Merged

mcs: support ttl config #7409

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023

Conversation

rleungx
Copy link
Member

@rleungx rleungx commented Nov 22, 2023

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Close #7296

What is changed and how does it work?

This PR supports TTL config for scheduling service.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Release note

None.

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 22, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • CabinfeverB
  • lhy1024

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. label Nov 22, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 22, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #7409 (57a642c) into master (58e9b20) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 80.41%.

❗ Current head 57a642c differs from pull request most recent head 58f9402. Consider uploading reports for the commit 58f9402 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7409      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.25%   74.25%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         451      451              
  Lines       49587    49629      +42     
==========================================
+ Hits        36820    36850      +30     
- Misses       9470     9476       +6     
- Partials     3297     3303       +6     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.25% <80.41%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@@ -534,7 +535,7 @@ func CreateServer(ctx context.Context, cfg *config.Config) *Server {
BaseServer: server.NewBaseServer(ctx),
DiagnosticsServer: sysutil.NewDiagnosticsServer(cfg.Log.File.Filename),
cfg: cfg,
persistConfig: config.NewPersistConfig(cfg),
persistConfig: config.NewPersistConfig(cfg, cache.NewStringTTL(ctx, time.Second*5, time.Minute*5)),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how about using a const value

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will we do it?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

if err != nil {
return err
if ttl != 0 {
// the minimum ttl is 5 seconds, if the given ttl is less than 5 seconds, we will use 5 seconds instead.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why add minium?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's set by etcd

@rleungx rleungx requested a review from lhy1024 November 27, 2023 03:01
Copy link
Contributor

@lhy1024 lhy1024 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the rest LGTM

@@ -534,7 +535,7 @@ func CreateServer(ctx context.Context, cfg *config.Config) *Server {
BaseServer: server.NewBaseServer(ctx),
DiagnosticsServer: sysutil.NewDiagnosticsServer(cfg.Log.File.Filename),
cfg: cfg,
persistConfig: config.NewPersistConfig(cfg),
persistConfig: config.NewPersistConfig(cfg, cache.NewStringTTL(ctx, time.Second*5, time.Minute*5)),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will we do it?

Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <rleungx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <rleungx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <rleungx@gmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Nov 27, 2023
Copy link
Member

@CabinfeverB CabinfeverB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rest LGTM

@@ -491,11 +491,11 @@ func (suite *configTestSuite) assertTTLConfigItemEqaul(
}
return false
}
suite.True(checkfunc(cluster.GetLeaderServer().GetServer().GetPersistOptions()))
suite.True(checkFunc(cluster.GetLeaderServer().GetServer().GetPersistOptions()))
if cluster.GetSchedulingPrimaryServer() != nil {
// wait for the scheduling primary server to be synced
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The check here does not include ttl expired cases? Because there was no waiting.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Nov 27, 2023
@rleungx
Copy link
Member Author

rleungx commented Nov 27, 2023

/merge

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 27, 2023

@rleungx: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 27, 2023

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 57a642c

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 27, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 27, 2023

@rleungx: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit a09717b into tikv:master Nov 27, 2023
22 checks passed
@rleungx rleungx deleted the ttl branch November 27, 2023 08:44
rleungx added a commit to rleungx/pd that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2023
close tikv#7296

Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <rleungx@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

mcs: support to sync config with ttl
3 participants