-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 725
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
client/http: add scheduleUpdateMembersInfo to get the latest members ASAP #7675
Conversation
Signed-off-by: JmPotato <ghzpotato@gmail.com>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has not been approved. To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
@@ -268,6 +286,7 @@ func (ci *clientInner) membersInfoUpdater(ctx context.Context) { | |||
log.Info("[pd] http client member info updater stopped", zap.String("source", ci.source)) | |||
return | |||
case <-ticker.C: | |||
case <-ci.updateMembersInfoNotifier: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fallthrough
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed.
Signed-off-by: JmPotato <ghzpotato@gmail.com>
} | ||
log.Debug("[pd] request follower addr failed", | ||
zap.String("source", ci.source), zap.Int("idx", idx), zap.String("addr", addr), zap.Error(err)) | ||
} | ||
// Schedule the members info update if all the requests failed to get the latest members as soon as possible. | ||
ci.scheduleUpdateMembersInfo() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
better using retry mechanism
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After using ServiceDiscovery, we can use ScheduleCheckMemberChanged
. How about waiting for #7668
/hold |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7675 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 73.72% 73.82% +0.09%
==========================================
Files 429 429
Lines 47379 47389 +10
==========================================
+ Hits 34931 34985 +54
+ Misses 9439 9416 -23
+ Partials 3009 2988 -21
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #7300, #7673.
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Release note