-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 333
[Bugfix] Adjust role assignment in warp specialization based on read access #647
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…access - Updated the role assignment logic in `warp_specialized_rewriter.cc` to set the role to `kConsumer` when no reads are detected, ensuring correct behavior in memory access scenarios.
|
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the TileLang project. Please remember to run We appreciate you taking this step! Our team will review your contribution, and we look forward to your awesome work! 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @chengyupku, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a bug in the warp specialization rewriter by refining the logic for assigning roles to memory access patterns. The change ensures that blocks with no read operations are correctly identified as consumers, which is essential for accurate memory access management and optimization within the warp specialization framework.
Highlights
- Bugfix: Role Assignment: Corrected the role assignment logic within
WarpSpecializedRoleMarkerto ensure that if a memory block has no detected read accesses, its role is accurately set tokConsumer. Previously, such blocks might have incorrectly defaulted tokProducer.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates the role assignment logic in warp_specialized_rewriter.cc to set the role to kConsumer when no reads are detected, ensuring correct behavior in memory access scenarios. The review focuses on improving the clarity of the code.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…access (tile-ai#647) * [Bugfix] Adjust role assignment in warp specialization based on read access - Updated the role assignment logic in `warp_specialized_rewriter.cc` to set the role to `kConsumer` when no reads are detected, ensuring correct behavior in memory access scenarios. * Apply suggestion from @gemini-code-assist[bot] Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Lei Wang <34334180+LeiWang1999@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
warp_specialized_rewriter.ccto set the role tokConsumerwhen no reads are detected, ensuring correct behavior in memory access scenarios.