Skip to content

Conversation

@LeiWang1999
Copy link
Member

as title.

@github-actions
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the TileLang project.

Please remember to run bash format.sh in the root directory of the project to ensure your changes are properly linted and formatted. This will help ensure your contribution passes the format check.

We appreciate you taking this step! Our team will review your contribution, and we look forward to your awesome work!

🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @LeiWang1999, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, despite its title suggesting CI improvements like virtual environment caching and pytest parallelization, primarily introduces a significant change to the TileLangThreadSyncPlanner in C++ to enhance memory access conflict detection. It also includes minor, seemingly unrelated, modifications to Python files. The discrepancy between the stated intent and the actual changes warrants further investigation.

Highlights

  • Discrepancy between PR intent and changes: The pull request title and description indicate an intent to enable virtual environment caching and parallelize pytest runs for CI. However, the actual code changes provided do not reflect these stated goals and instead modify core logic in C++ and Python files unrelated to CI.
  • Core logic modification in src/transform/thread_storage_sync.cc: Introduced a new range_is_overlap boolean variable and associated logic within the TileLangThreadSyncPlanner class. This change refines the conflict detection mechanism for thread storage synchronization by proving whether memory access ranges overlap using analyzer_.CanProve and then using this new boolean to determine if buffers are in conflict.
  • Minor Python file changes: A minor typo (d appended to destroy_model_parallel) was introduced in examples/bitnet-1.58b/vllm_workspace/conftest.py. Additionally, a blank line was removed from tilelang/engine/phase.py.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request's title and description suggest CI/CD improvements, but the code changes seem unrelated, focusing instead on compiler logic and fixing a typo. Please consider updating the PR title and description to accurately reflect the contents.

I've identified a critical syntax error in conftest.py that needs to be fixed. Additionally, I've provided a few suggestions for the C++ code in thread_storage_sync.cc to improve its readability and maintainability. Please take a look at my comments.

Comment on lines 281 to 285
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The logic here can be simplified by combining the two CanProve calls into a single condition. This makes the code more concise and easier to understand.

        range_is_overlap =
            !(analyzer_.CanProve(prev_indice < curr_indice || prev_indice > curr_indice,
                                 arith::ProofStrength::kSymbolicBound));

Comment on lines 306 to 308
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This comment restates what the following line of code does. The code return range_is_overlap; is self-explanatory, and the preceding comment provides enough context. It's best to avoid comments that simply mirror the code's logic.

@LeiWang1999 LeiWang1999 merged commit c12eb18 into tile-ai:main Jul 23, 2025
3 checks passed
@challenger0004
Copy link

Hey

RubiaCx pushed a commit to RubiaCx/tilelang that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants