-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 316
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for PKCS#8 private keys #195
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#113 asked for both import and export of PKCS#8 format
the branches identified by coveralls as missing coverage should also be unit tested |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll make those changes and add test coverage; just one question about detecting the format.
I don't see how my changes could have caused this decrease in code coverage (the python3.3 version of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see how my changes could have caused this decrease in code coverage (the python3.3 version of hmac_compat not getting called).
yes, there's one test case that's non-deterministic (it's generating numbers and tests them for primality) and causes the overall coverage to jump by that 0.4%, don't worry about it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
r+
awesome, thank you! |
Closes #113