Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update django-storages to 1.5.1 #11

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

There's a new version of django-storages available.
You are currently using 1.5.0. I have updated it to 1.5.1

Changelog

1.5.1


  • Drop support for Django 1.7 (185_)
  • Deprecate hashpath, image, overwrite, mogile, symlinkorcopy, database, mogile, couchdb.
    See (issue 202_) to discuss maintenance going forward
  • Use a fixed mtime argument for GzipFile in S3BotoStorage and S3Boto3Storage to ensure
    a stable output for gzipped files
  • Use .putfileobj instead of .put in S3Boto3Storage to use the transfer manager,
    allowing files greater than 5GB to be put on S3 (194_ , 201_)
  • Update S3Boto3Storage for Django 1.10 (181_) (get_modified_time and get_accessed_time) thanks JshWright
  • Fix bad kwarg name in S3Boto3Storage when AWS_PRELOAD_METADATA is True (189, 190) thanks leonsmith

.. _issue 202: jschneier/django-storages#202
.. _201: jschneier/django-storages#201
.. _194: jschneier/django-storages#194
.. _190: jschneier/django-storages#190
.. _189: jschneier/django-storages#189
.. _185: jschneier/django-storages#185
.. _181: jschneier/django-storages#181

Got merge conflicts? Close this PR and delete the branch. I'll create a new PR for you.

Happy merging! 🤖

@tnir
Copy link
Owner

tnir commented Sep 14, 2016

looks nice 👍

@tnir tnir self-assigned this Nov 8, 2016
@tnir
Copy link
Owner

tnir commented Nov 10, 2016

close this and delete this branch to resolve conflicts

@tnir tnir closed this Nov 10, 2016
@tnir tnir deleted the pyup-update-django-storages-1.5.0-to-1.5.1 branch November 10, 2016 08:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants