Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.6-slim to 3.9.13-slim #23

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

toharzand
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Changes included in this PR

  • docker/Dockerfile.python-3.6

We recommend upgrading to python:3.9.13-slim, as this image has only 47 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Some of the most important vulnerabilities in your base image include:

Severity Priority Score / 1000 Issue Exploit Maturity
critical severity 500 Buffer Overflow
SNYK-DEBIAN11-GLIBC-2340922
No Known Exploit
medium severity 514 CVE-2021-4160
SNYK-DEBIAN11-OPENSSL-2388380
No Known Exploit
high severity 614 Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
SNYK-DEBIAN11-OPENSSL-2426309
No Known Exploit
critical severity 786 OS Command Injection
SNYK-DEBIAN11-OPENSSL-2807596
No Known Exploit
critical severity 786 OS Command Injection
SNYK-DEBIAN11-OPENSSL-2807596
No Known Exploit

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

Copy link

@prisma-cloud-devsecops prisma-cloud-devsecops bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Prisma Cloud has found configuration errors in this PR ⬇️

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
FROM python:3.6-slim
FROM python:3.9.13-slim

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LOW   A user for the container has not been created
    Resource: /docker/Dockerfile.python-3.6. | ID: BC_DKR_3

Description

Containers should run as a non-root user. It is good practice to run the container as a non-root user, where possible. This can be done either via the ```USER``` directive in the ```Dockerfile``` or through ```gosu``` or similar where used as part of the ```CMD``` or ```ENTRYPOINT``` directives.

Benchmarks

  • CIS DOCKER V1.2 4.1

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
FROM python:3.6-slim
FROM python:3.9.13-slim

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LOW   Healthcheck instructions have not been added to container images
    Resource: /docker/Dockerfile.python-3.6. | ID: BC_DKR_2

Description

We recommend that you add the HEALTHCHECK instruction to your Docker container images to ensure that health checks are executed against running containers.

An important security control is that of availability. Adding the HEALTHCHECK instruction to your container image ensures that the Docker engine periodically checks the running container instances against that instruction to ensure that containers are still operational.

Based on the results of the health check, the Docker engine could terminate containers which are not responding correctly, and instantiate new ones.

Benchmarks

  • CIS DOCKER V1.2 4.6

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
FROM python:3.6-slim
FROM python:3.9.13-slim

MAINTAINER Snyk Ltd

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LOW   LABEL maintainer is used instead of MAINTAINER (deprecated)
    Resource: /docker/Dockerfile.python-3.6.MAINTAINER | ID: BC_DKR_6

Description

The LABEL instruction is much more flexible and recommended to replace the MAINTAINER (deprecated) instruction in a Dockerfile.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants