Change Handler
to have an associated Future
type
#879
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This removes
#[async_trait]
fromHandler
and replaces that with anassociated
Future
type.As hinted at in #878 I'm working on something with types that need to
implement
Handler
. I'm doing that by wrapping otherHandler
types soI can implement
Handler
by simply delegating and thus don't need toallocate another box for
#[async_trait]
. This change makes thatpossible.
It does make
Handler
less ergonomic to implement but thats a veryniche feature so I'm fine with that. It wouldn't be appropriate for
FromRequest
IMO.